Shouldn't it be 3 earned runs? I mean, the first error was Samardzija's. Does that matter? No, it doesn't. If the person who reached on an error by the pitcher comes around to score, it's still an unearned run. I've always thought they should change that. But this was an errant pickoff throw (granted there's a chance that the runner would score from second without the errant pickoff throw, but it was a pretty hard hit RBI single). Well, usually in that case, the home team's scorer makes the call. I think it could really go either way. But if it was with 2 outs and the guy reached on a base hit and then advanced to 2nd on the error, I'd probably rule it an "unearned" run, simply because he would not have scored on a base hit if the errant throw did not happen. Obviously I didnt see the game but having seen many with similar situations, here is my take on it... With Jackson Brennan batting, throwing error by Jeff Samardzija on the pickoff attempt, Neil Walton to 2nd. Jackson Brennan grounds out, pitcher Jeff Samardzija to first baseman Kyle Reynolds. Neil Walton to 3rd. Hunter Vick singles on a line drive to center fielder Tyler Colvin. Neil Walton scores. On the groundout, had there not been an error, Brennan would have gone to 2nd (an official scorer is NOT ALLOWED to assume a double play and you can only assume an out at 1st, not a FC out). Then it is in the scorer's judgement if the runner would have scored from 2nd on the single that happened by Vick. With 2 outs, and as long as it isnt a catcher running, it is a pretty safe assumption, especially at the A level when it takes a perfect throw and tag combo to get a guy at the plate. 98 % of the time, a run in this situation is going to be earned whether it is fair or not, it is an earned run based on the rules handed down by MLB on what you can and can't assume!