Not bad and you forgot Wyatt, dont underrate Peoria which could be as good or better. Peoria? Isn't virtually that entire team devoid of prospects? Anyway, I'm glad to see that Burke is not being overmatched like he had been for the rest of his minor league career. I'm actually glad the Cubs picked up a high-ceiling offensive prospect, because they really don't have any outside of Vitters. (i'm assuming Dopirak and Harvey are busts) Wrong again on Peoria, after thee aforementioned Samson and Barney you have pitchers Pino, Ceda, Lambert and Renshaw and you have everyday players in Lansford, Leon Johnson, and wait till Hardman gets some at bats. My next question is what makes Burke a " high-ceiling" player? Would that be his baseball america ranking in high school? Pina, Ceda, and to a lesser extent Renshaw(all pitchers) are the only real prospects at Peoria, they are completely devoid of potential major league hitters. I disagree. Hernandez is a way better prospect than Pina. So is Maestri and probably Papelbon. As for the hitters, Barney, Adduci, Lansford and Castillo are all prospects...you guys can love Boise all you want but remember all the guys you loved at Boise last year are the ones you hate here this season...AND Johnston and Burke both failed pretty badly hitting in this league so that SHOULD tell you the HUGE difference between Boise and Peoria just as there is a huge difference pitching wise between Peoria and Daytona...