OBP is more than just walks, my friend. Exactly..you'll agree with me that OBP is basically BA and walks combined, wouldn't you? I know there are other factors to OBP, but they are pretty unimportant. If that is the case, then what is the bigger factor in OBP? Why is OBP so good? Of course OBP is a better stat then average-it is a more complete stat. The question is-of the two components that primarily make up OBP, average and walks-which one is more important to have a higher number in? If you have a .350 OBP, would you rather have a team hit .320 with a few number of walks, or a team who hit .270 with a great number of walks? What I'm saying is that with similar OBP's, it is the team with the greater average who will typically have the much better offense. If OBP is equal and constant, you pick other stats that are greater. It's not that simple. Compare Cincinnati to the Cubs in 2005. We had a higher BA (270-261). They were a little bit higher in SLG (446-440), but they were +15 in OBP. They scored 117 more runs than us with 53 less hits. They got more people on base, and scored a lot more runs because they drew 611 walks to our 419.