I'm afraid of it too but I'm not going around calling Lou one of the worst managers in the league when we have the best record in the league. That seems odd to me. The best team in the league can't have one of the worst at something? I'd say the 2004 team was among the best in the league, and they had the worst third-base coach in history. who said they can't have one of the worst anything in history? Some things you can egt away with. Like our CF's haven't been great this year. One thing you can't get away with and still have the best record in baseball is have a horrible manager. You can make playoffs with a abd manager if the talent on the team is good enough, but plenty of people seem to criticize our GM as well so. You can't have a bad GM and bad manager and still be a great team. Semms to me Lou is doing something right (and Hendry for that matter). It's hard to argue that Lou hasn't cost us runs over the course of the season with his in-game moves. Whether those lost runs have cost us wins is a game-by-game issue, I think. But his use of his pitching staff, Marmol and Marquis especially, has put us at risk of losing future games. His inability to pry Marquis from the rotation has almost certainly cost us games, though we've overcome some mediocre or worse starts by Marquis to get a W. We've lost 5 of his last 7 starts, 5 of which were bad performances by Marquis (we lost one of his good starts and overcame one of his bad ones). To be fair, he hasn't gotten a ton of run support lately (2, 7, 3, 3, 4, 4, 8), but he also has been taxing the pen as he's only gotten at least 6 IP in 2 of those starts. Hard to say, but I think we could have gotten at least 1 W with a different SP (we scored 7 runs in 1 and lost, Jason went 5 and got hammered) and even if we don't get more Ws, we should at least have a starter that could have gotten us an inning or two more in most of his starts.