are we sure his value rebounds after the second half? Hasn't Haren been a first half pitcher literally every year of his career (eta: checked the stats, looks like his first full year - '05 - is the lone exception)? And are the Dbacks thinking Haren isn't worth the $29m he's going to get for the next 2 years (or $41m over the next 3)? I really don't know one way or the other, but I'm wondering if this is really a horrible deal for the Dbacks. Saunders is no Haren (despite what the GM says about his wins), but he's a guy you can run out there every 5th day in the NLW and pay 1/3 of what you're paying Haren. If you're not winning this year and not expecting to win next year, maybe getting 2 players you really like, a ML starter (in his first arb year), and saving yourself $20m+ over the next 2 years isn't so bad. Especially given what the fangraphs article said about Haren's value around the league.