So...a team that values hitting over pitching is going to trade one of the most productive bats in MLB, who is young and locked up in an excellent deal for a has-been negative WAR first baseman as a placeholder for a prospect who has never hit MLB pitching? you can't rule it out, but if you do I would argue that if you can't imagine such a thing, you should go through some sort of regression therapy and try to reëstablish contact with your youthful imagination. Because right now you're living a barren existence. EDIT: Ahhhhhh. Thanks for the clarification. Neyer's hypothesis is irrelevant to the current trade speculation, as they wouldn't trade Rizzo without Schwarber at least attempting 1B (he's never even played that position). I would also disagree with Neyer - I think they would try every way possible to keep them both in the same lineup. As mentioned previously, it still holds that a team who places a larger value on batting wouldn't trade Rizzo for a pitcher. Stanton? Now we're getting somewhere...