When does the ACC not have a great year? I don't think they are having a great year this year. UNC has underachieved, Duke is horribly overrated, I do like Maryland, Florida State is doing what they always do take top 100 players and go sub .450 in conference, Georgia Tech is way too young to be dangerous, Wake Forest quit fielding a team after CP3 left, BC and Clemson started great but have limped to the finish, Now the Virginia schools have done really awesome, and I am not sure if NC State or Miami even have teams. While good the Pac-10 is clearly the best league. I also like the Big East better. The ACC looks good because Carolina and Duke have not played up to expectations or were very overrated. Conference RPI says ACC is the best conference. And despite your digs at NC St and Miami, they're a lot better than the dregs of the Pac 10 (Arizona St and Oregon St). Oh by the way if BC and Clemson have limped to the finish, I'd like to hear your interpretation of the seasons that Arizona, Cal and Washington have had. Ok the conference RPI thing is great in the tourny I like the Pac 10 to go farther than the ACC. The only ACC team I really think that is athreat to get three rounds in is Carolina. That is unless the committee uses the vbdi to seed Duke a 2 in NC. Where as I think that UCLA, Washington State, Oregon, and Arizona all could do damage. Yes Arizona if they get in, which they always do. They also always beat or nearly beat someone they shouldn't two years ago Illinois and last year UCONN.