Look at the talent around Rodgers. He's more mobile than Favre, that's not even a comparison. Sure Favre had an ability to get away from sacks. If you remember the 4-12 season a couple of years ago, he should've been sacked numerous times. Instead, plenty of his 29 interceptions came from avoiding sacks and flinging the ball right into the secondary. The talent is around Rodgers to succeed. He's got a decent offensive line, a running back that hits holes harder than any other RB in the league, and most importantly he has great playmakers around him at the WR and TE positions. We led the league in YAC last year. That's what happens when you have guys at those positions that can make plays on their feet. That's also what happens when you have a quarterback that finally buys into a system that his coach was preaching on him to learn for the last few years and look what happened to Favre. He had one of his best years in his career last year. The west-coast offense is a very QB-friendly offense designed for the receivers to make plays once they get the ball. We have the wideouts to do that. With the defense we have (even though we've struggled a bit in the preseason), all Rodgers has to do is be average and a 9 or 10 win season should come pretty easily. Sure losing Favre was big, but how did he do in 2005 and 2006? Not that great. People were saying how he should've retired those couple of years and many said Rodgers could have been better. Now that Favre had a great year, all the outsiders are skeptical of Rodgers. If Favre retires the year before, I doubt Rodgers is being questioned as much and as often as he is now. As long as he plays average, we'll be fine this year.