But the point is, you're giving a lot of those ABs to Baez and Alcantara who failed to produce anything close to a .700 OPS in a decent sample size this year. And throw in that Bryant isn't guaranteed to not struggle either. All while hoping for repeats from Castro, Rizzo, Soler over 140+ games, and the journeymen in the OF platoons. That is indeed the point. By all means, the Cubs should try and field a competitive team next season - not least because they should have been trying harder to do that for the last three years, and because they're adding one of the best managers in the game. They should spend money, and try to add pieces that can help win games in 2015 and beyond. But if you're going to commit to playing guys like Baez, Bryant, Soler and Alcantara every day - as I think you should - then I think you have to accept that the Cubs are not as far along in this process as the Royals were going into 2013. Unless you're going to sell-out the long-term plan, as Theo is so fond of saying, it's probably not realistic to think the Cubs are going to be playoff contenders next season. They should announce to the world that they plan to be, and act accordingly - but that doesn't mean we shouldn't keep our expectations reasonable. If there's 1 thing the Cubs have going for them that the Royals didn't is that Rizzo is probably slightly ahead of 2012 Butler, maybe more when you consider one actually plays a position. Castro is probably a little lesser than Gordon, but plays a premium position. And Arrieta is a good bit better than Guthrie was in 2012. So, if the Cubs do like they did and add an ace (they got Shields) and get lucky with a secondary arm (they got Santana while waiting on Ventura), then I could see a playoff appearance, but the Cubs also had further to go as a team and in a tougher division.