He did address the closer situation. Over the off-season he stated on several occasions he wanted Ryan Dempster to close. Dusty Baker wanted him in the starting rotation instead. Had Dempster been in the closer's role all along the Cubs would be better. Not significantly better, mind you, but at least around .500 unstead of six games under. bull. as gm if you wanted a guy to close he would close. we had dozens of possible starters to fill in and 0 closers. hendry never ever planned on dempster. he was only used after every other option had bombed. the trib spent more money than anyone. but hendry spent so much dead money that we paid 100 mil for a team with 60 mil in salaries. Great! Then what was your solution, since you would have made a better GM? Who would you have signed? Overpaid for Percival and watch him out the whole year? Benitez and watch him go down? Who would you have signed, since I know that there are so many good closers out there who are just rotting on the benches of good teams. Oh wait, no, there are hardly ANY good closers. Maybe the Yankees would have taken Sisco for Rivera, then it would have solved two of our beef's about Hendry. I ask again - who would you have signed? It is so easy to criticize, but maybe there was nobody worth the money to sign or trade? Kolb? Ya, and give up the farm to a division rival. That would have been good. I am definitely not absolving Hendry of all guilt this year, but to sit here and say that he ruined this year because of not getting a closer is ridiculous! If there is noone to get at the right price, then you cannot be blamed for not getting one.