Murton was sort of collateral damage from the Soriano signing. The Cubs wanted/needed to make a big splash after the disaster of 2006, and it just so happened that the best available FA that year (Soriano) plays the only position Murton's shown himself to be competent at. Under ideal circumstances, the best available FA that year would've been a SS or a 2B or even a RF, and Murton would've been able to remain the everyday LF -- and I bet the Cubs would agree with that. (Next best outcome would be for Murton to display an ability to play a passable RF... he hasn't, at least not in Lou's eyes.) Unfortunately those weren't the circumstances, and so here we are... not by design so much as by coincidence. Coincidence? No, we're here b/c our GM is terrible at building a baseball team. Let's focus on the topic at hand please. Would Hendry have built a better baseball team if he had installed Murton in LF and passed on Soriano? How about if he had installed Murton in RF and passed on Fukudome? Which of those two guys is Murton better than? Recall that since the Soriano signing, the Cubs have made efforts to get Murton regular PT. First Soriano did not work out in CF, necessitating a return to LF; then Murton did not work out in RF because of his defensive shortcomings (real or perceived). What? Signing Cliff Floyd is not what I call making every effort to get Murton regular playing time. It wasn't Murton's defense that kept him out of RF, it was Floyd.