Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Rob

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    15,331

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Rob

  1. Rob
    Do you really not understand the term? I stated it earlier. Lake has the raw physical tools to hit 20+ HR and swipe 40+ bags while sticking at SS. There's also something like a 2% chance of that happening. that's been done four times in the history of baseball, so i'll certainly take the under on those odds Okay. Less than 2% Now explain to me how that isn't his upside.
  2. Rob
    Do you propose ignoring potential development by a prospect when determining upside? no, not attainable potential development. a guy can add bulk to his frame and start putting doubles over the wall, but guys don't really ever suddenly start to gain some semblance of strike zone command after nearly 2000 PA of horrible ineptitude Haven't read fangraphs this week? Besides which, it's absolutely not unheard of for guys to boost their walk rates. We've even got a good example on the team right now in Soriano. 4.5 BB% through his first 3500 PA. 7.4% in the 3400 since. Vlad and Sosa always come to mind when I think about notorious free swingers who were surprisingly patient in their primes. Braun keeps improving his BB%. It does happen, however rarely. ETA: Hanley Ramirez, too.
  3. Rob
    I've seen stuff like this done before for baseball... though for the life of me I can't remember where. It's certainly an interesting idea though.
  4. Rob
    I can't think of a single 1B to OF conversion that's gone well.
  5. Rob
    Do you really not understand the term? I stated it earlier. Lake has the raw physical tools to hit 20+ HR and swipe 40+ bags while sticking at SS. There's also something like a 2% chance of that happening. But he has the ability to do things that guys like Ryan Theriot never possessed the physical skills to achieve. That's the upside. Upside is not the same thing as most likely outcome. And nobody has said anything to misrepresent what the most likely outcome for Lake is.
  6. Rob
    "Huge strides" is probably an exaggeration. Ian Desmond is a pretty good comp for the career path Lake is on right now. Low walks, high strikeouts, poor fielding, but with a bit of pop and some speed. Desmond grades out as a somewhat below average regular, with fWAR totals of 1.3 and 1.4 the last two years. If Lake takes a good step forward in any one of those categories (or numerous small strides), that would make him a league-average starter. He'd still be young, cost-controlled, and have considerable upside beyond that. As long as Lake is making some forward progress it doesn't make much sense to cash in a chip like that just to gamble he might be a closer someday. i get serious indigestion every time i read that Lake and Vitters have "huge upside"; it's so ignorant to overlook their total cluelessness of the strike zone or inability to field their position and hope that's somehow able to drastically change; their upside is to i guess suppress these problems just enough to sneak their way into the majors for a few seasons I don't think you know what upside means. Hint: It's not just the most likely scenario. Also, who overlooked anything? I went into detail about Lake's issues.
  7. Rob
    The comparison wasn't meant to be exact, just an approximation. A reasonable projection for Lake based on what he's showing right now probably has Lake with a little more power/speed than Desmond... but an inferior fielder and showing a slightly worse plate approach. Those are pretty similarly valuable players. All I was working towards was finding a reasonable estimate for a WAR target. If you're saying that Desmond is going to get the benefit of the doubt because he's more likely to stick at SS, I'll agree with you. If Lake moves to 3B, the Cubs front office likely wont stick with him through a couple below-average seasons while hoping he'll turn it around. If you're saying that Desmond deserves the benefit of the doubt over Lake because he's more likely to stick at SS... that's a little more tricky.
  8. Rob
    "Huge strides" is probably an exaggeration. Ian Desmond is a pretty good comp for the career path Lake is on right now. Low walks, high strikeouts, poor fielding, but with a bit of pop and some speed. Desmond grades out as a somewhat below average regular, with fWAR totals of 1.3 and 1.4 the last two years. If Lake takes a good step forward in any one of those categories (or numerous small strides), that would make him a league-average starter. He'd still be young, cost-controlled, and have considerable upside beyond that. As long as Lake is making some forward progress it doesn't make much sense to cash in a chip like that just to gamble he might be a closer someday.
  9. Rob
    His upside is immense. I'd go so far as to say he has the best raw tools in the entire system. The potential is there for 20+ HR and 40+ SB while playing good defense at SS. However, he some major issues. He strikes out too often, doesn't like to take a walk, and routinely makes mental mistakes in the field. CUBZ99 is right. Among those scouts who don't feel like Lake will ever get his approach in line there's a growing sentiment that the Cubs should convert him to the mound. His arm strength grades out at a pure 80 (on the 20-80 scouting scale) and he could potentially be a dominant late inning reliever (or perhaps even a starter). Even those scouts that want him to stay a position player mostly want him to move off SS (mostly due to mental errors)... but where he ends up is an uncertainty even then -- I've seen 3B, 2B, CF, RF, and LF all mentioned. And whether he moves to certain spots might influence whether he decides to bulk up and trade some speed for power. It's fair to say Lake is a bit of a wild card. Aside from the undeniable tools, everything about him is a question mark. I wouldn't expect to see him in Chicago next year though. While he's certainly got the talent to force his way up, he's got more than enough to be working on in the minors.
  10. Rob
    :lol:
  11. Rob
    The Yankees aren't a fit. Andruw Jones is cheaper and more effective than Soriano at everything the Yankees might want to use Soriano for.
  12. Rob
    Yeah, Felix Pie came up in 2007. Aside from that, nice post.
  13. Rob
    You're looking at the new Head Cheerleader.
  14. Rob
    The Yankees already have Andruw Jones, who is better than Soriano at everything the Yankees might want Soriano to do. It's not a fit.
  15. Rob
    BJ Upton has posted 4 or more WAR 4 of the last 5 seasons (and 2 of the last 3). His 4.1 WAR last season would have ranked only behind Matt Garza on the Cubs. This myth that BJ Upton is some sort of bust is absurd. He may not have lived up to his considerable upside, but he's still a very good player. I didn't say he was a bust, but he's simply not an impact bat. I get his value as a center fielder, but if someone were to move him to a corner that what happens to his WAR? I'm far too lazy to run the numbers, but I don't think it would hurt him very much at all. It might even help him. Being a plus-plus defender in a corner would go a long way towards offsetting the slight increase in expected offensive production.
  16. Rob
    BJ Upton has posted 4 or more WAR 4 of the last 5 seasons (and 2 of the last 3). His 4.1 WAR last season would have ranked only behind Matt Garza on the Cubs. This myth that BJ Upton is some sort of bust is absurd. He may not have lived up to his considerable upside, but he's still a very good player.
  17. Rob
    why the [expletive] are people booing crane kenney? if i ever go to a cubs convention in 20 years and crane kenney is still working for the cubs, i'm going to give him a standing ovation while everyone else is booing. For a long while I was leading the charge against misinformed idiots hating on Crane Kenny. But at a certain point I'm inclined to believe that where there's smoke, there's fire... and there's been a hell of a lot of smoke from even the respected beat writers.
  18. Rob
    Yeah, one has to wonder how many more years Jack Z is going to last at this point. I've really liked some of the smaller moves Jack Z has made during his tenure. But all of his big moves have been pretty bad. His medical staff must hate Pineda and his coaching staff must think he's never gonna throw a halfway decent change...
  19. Rob
    Is a non-elite reliever worth spending $3 mil on for a non-contending club? Probably not. Would I gladly spend $3 mil per season on Kerry Wood to keep him a Cub for the rest of his career? Absolutely. This is one of those few circumstances where heart > brain. At least as far as I'm concerned.
  20. Rob
    He should have learned the lesson from the original incident - not much good happens after midnight. [nccub inserts pic from gremlins] [davearm calls him a rapist] [west side rooter tells us lahair could have hit that better than expected]
  21. Rob
    Strangely enough, when creating the thread I was certain that I would screw up the spelling of his name... so I copied and pasted it directly from the BP article. Then the jerks realized they were spelling his name wrong and edited their own article, leaving me looking like a moron. I refuse to edit the title until I receive a full apology from BP. It's a matter of principle now.
  22. Rob
    Actually, Porcello has 2 years and 170 days of service time. (172 days is a year) He's got 4 more seasons of club control.
  23. Rob
    Selig's tenure has been good for the business of baseball, of that there is little doubt. But as to baseball itself... interleague play, unbalanced schedules (especially with the absurd "rivalry" interleague series) and steps he's initiated towards the DH in the NL are all things that I do not care for. What can I say? I'm a traditionalist. And for everything intelligent he's done like create MLBAM to make really cool stuff like Gameday and the PitchFX system readily available to mass consumption, you'll see real headscratchers like the blackout restrictions and the pulling down of every single clip on youtube. He's not a total success. He's not a complete failure. But based on what I care about, my opinion of him leans more towards failure.
  24. Rob
    I am not a Selig fan. For every good thing he does, he manages to do an equally dumb thing.
  25. Rob
    Yeah, that seems like a cop out.
×
×
  • Create New...