Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Rob

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    15,267
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Rob

  1. I'd be more inclined to hold it. Then tell everybody that if I got enough donations (it could probably be six digits), I'd destroy it in some fantastic way with news cameras present for all the world to see. That way, you get the money, and then you rub it in Bonds' face that nobody likes him.
  2. I believe that Cubs fans have to believe other teams will fall back and we will surge forward... otherwise the last century would have killed us.
  3. Who are all more valuable than the slap-hitting Figgins. What can Figgins do that Theriot can't, anyway? Nevermind that, since when do those four players represent an archetype? They aren't even very similar at all, other than being white. Now, if he's saying that Murton projects to be a caucasian, then I'd have to agree wholeheartedly. And since when is Mientkiewicz an OF?
  4. Genital? Sure, why not? Still seems pleasant by comparison.
  5. I'd rather have herpes than Figgins.
  6. Are these guys pitchers? Price is a college lefty. Wieters is a college catcher. Porcello is a righty prep pitcher. Vitters is a prep 3B, and supposedly the best pure hitter in the draft.
  7. WCIU sucks. I hate being downstate.
  8. Tampa Bay is almost certainly taking Price. Kansas City is interesting though. Personally I think they're going to take either Wieters or Porcello. If they take Wieters, I'm about 90% sure the Cubs take Vitters. If KC takes Porcello, I'd say it's about 60-40 Vitters-Wieters.
  9. In Christina Kahrl's chat on BP, she said that apparently the draft is being slowed down to about five minutes per pick in the first round. No details on whether that applies to the supplemental first round and beyond, though...
  10. Well yes frankly it is a little hard to understand. He makes the Cubs better to have in CF then to not have him in CF. Who is going to out produce him? Pie is very questionable offensively and I don't see Soriano moving back there. Plus, I don't have a whole lot of faith in Hendry getting anything of value for him. So, for everyone that wants him traded, what do you think we could get? (reasonably) Pie is only questionable cause Lou isn't find him enough at bats. Even at that, he's 9 for his last 30 and he's got the potential to be better than Jacque with the bat right now. Bottom line is, moving to Pie in center really isn't a downgrade when factoring in defense... and there's more upside there for Pie. Meanwhile, Jacque is playing better than we can reasonably expect him to for the rest of the season, and we may be well served to see what we could get for him on the open market. Nobody here is suggesting that we just ship him off to whoever wont make us pay most of the contract... but if we can get a decent offer there is absolutely no reason not to trade him. He's redundant.
  11. I don't have a huge problem with the way Lou has been deploying his bench. It's supposed to be a strength of the team (for once) and Lou is trying to use it to maximum value. I do wish he'd show more restraint with the bullpen, though. If puts Pie out in CF in the 7th inning, he can stay there through 22 innings, if need be. The same can not be said of our relievers. I'm not too comfortable the way we always go into the 9th with maybe two or three relievers available for the rest of the game.
  12. He and Coats are both listed on the Cubs.com 40 man roster.
  13. Then Prior's FA clock is ticking again. Don't care. Prior will not be in a position to demand a huge contract. Or we could just DFA Pagan to get him off the 40 man.
  14. Yeah, I've noticed this as well. This article seems to suggest otherwise, but I've always gotten that impression from Gammons' articles. I get the distinct impression that he's fed misinformation by every GM out there because they know he'll report it. They cover for that by telling him about crap like Rothschild giving him a book.
  15. Well, the arm used to belong to Abe. Seriously - the hand belongs to some zookeeper in Thailand. They tranquilized the croc and sewed the zookeeper's arm back on. Neat.
  16. he said since he came back last year, not this year. Do I still have to eat an alligator? The gator misread your post. * I'll remove that if it's too graphic for some people, but it was all over network tv. ** And that's a croc, not a gator. All over network tv? Who's arm is it?
  17. he said since he came back last year, not this year. Do I still have to eat an alligator? Just half... your choice of front or back.
  18. Too optimistic to be a Cubs fan? Screw you, man. This is exactly the type of mentality that's been plaguing this franchise for 99 years. Why not be optimistic? We have a good team on paper, we have momentum, we were playing the dregs of the league with the Nationals. Why not a good road trip and a sweep? "Screw you, man" is not an appropriate response. Sorry man, but I just got so angry. Don't let me fool you; I have no authority whatsoever here. No need to apologize to me.
  19. You don't get ESPN?
  20. Too optimistic to be a Cubs fan? Screw you, man. This is exactly the type of mentality that's been plaguing this franchise for 99 years. Why not be optimistic? We have a good team on paper, we have momentum, we were playing the dregs of the league with the Nationals. Why not a good road trip and a sweep? "Screw you, man" is not an appropriate response.
  21. Not a bad idea, except where would The Riot play? I think, in my opinion, that there's no need to move The Riot, considering how well he's been performing. Again, the entire idea is predicated on the idea that Theriot will come back down to earth sometime.
  22. If you'd rather decrease win expectancy slightly in order to allow the team to conform more closely to archaic and antiquated views about lineup construction, I suppose that's a tradeoff that you can decide whether you'd like to make. Personally, I will root for the team to win, even if it necessitates the employ of unconventional tactics. Me too, but I don't think this would help the Cubs win. At all. Even sac bunts can be useful if used correctly. This is no different.
  23. And Winn doubles to right. I've got both Hamels and Lincecum going for me tonight, and I'm already happy that I can afford to give up 12 runs over the next 11.2 innings and still win ERA.
  24. Then he recovers to strikeout Utley and Howard.
×
×
  • Create New...