I feel weird taking up the banner, but I'm actually a fan of the Hosmer signing.
Let's get this out of the way early. The only reason that I like him at all is his league-minimum contract. And while there's no good reason for the Cubs to operate on the tight budget that they do, that's the reality of our ownership situation. And in that reality, guys on a contract like this can only be bad if they're performing below replacement-level or taking at-bats from better players.
And when it comes right down to it, Hosmer isn't likely to perform below replacement-level. He's not a great player, by any means. But he's an above-average defender, and he hits at a slightly better than league average clip. And to that point, given his extreme groundball proclivities, there's a good chance that the rule changes to the shift play to his benefit. He's not a good baserunner, but he's not Billy Butler.
So is Hosmer taking ABs from better players? It's certainly possible. Mervis may be better. But that's still a very open-ended question. There's likely no harm in trotting Hosmer out there until Mervis shows a little more. And it's not like the other guys Hosmer is competing with for ABs don't have their own question marks.
Hosmer is a steady enough known quantity with a little upside thanks to the new rules. And with his contract, he'll be out the door in a flash if he isn't living up to his end of the bargain, or if our young guys start mashing. He does no harm while holding the fort for a bit. Not bad for literally no additional investment above the league minimum.