How is she clearly guilty? Doesn't aggravated assault actually require some sort of actual assault? Two bad things come out of this situation. A) The stupid fan makes other fans look bad. B) Now the Jones apologists are trying to shift the discussion off of his horrendous play (mediocre hitting, brutal base running and poor defense add up to horrendous play) and onto fan treatment. There was next to no mention of his indefensible baserunning gaffe when Mike & Mike talked about this situation this morning. And the vast majority of the Jones talk in the papers this morning was about the idiot fan, and not his repeated pick-offs. I have yet to read or hear what Baker had to say about the pick-off, if he had anything to say at all. In short, I hate that fan for giving a bad name to drinking and having fun at the ballpark, for making Cubs fans look like idiots and for taking away from the conversation that should be going on, which is Jones costing his team with his pathetic baserunning. No offense, but with regard to what is an "assualt" and what is a "battery" under the law in IL, you don't know what you are talking about. Assault is the act of putting another person in imminent fear of being on the receiving end of a battery. A battery is any unwanted and harmful touching. "Aggravating factors" include the use of a weapon (like a stick or gun) or projectile (like a baseball). Thus, the bleacher lady appears to have been guilty of aggravated assault and attempted battery. It is also likely that she was guilty of drunk and disorderly conduct. Now that my legal treatise is at an end, let me be clear on my opinion. I am not a Jones apologist. If it had happened to Murton, my opinion would have been the same. The fans have the absolute right to boo Jones all they want, and given his penchant for mental gaffes, they should. But she crossed the line, and should be held responsible for her actions. In sum, I agree with your last paragraph.