Jump to content
North Side Baseball

CubinNY

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    27,596
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    23

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by CubinNY

  1. Well...since we're forgoing the don't attack the poster attack the post rules... soap drop you. I was there, they said it to me, I thought some in this forum would find it interesting. I attacked the ridiculous nature of the post. The Cubs lost on Saturday, a few guys bought tickets that day and flew out Sunday. Big freaking deal. People who can afford it by last minute tickets all the time, including open-ended refundable tickets. This is an absurd rant. What do you want him to do, sit around and hold hands with crying fans? I thought it was pretty bad that he bought the ticket before they'd even lost the game. Other than that I'd have agreed with you, well, except for the way you go about saying it...but I should know by now that's just the way you do things. Not to pile on, but I don't get why you think that is bad. These are multi-millionaires we are talking about. Hell, they probably had someone who worked for the Cubs purchase the tickets the day off the game with an open date that could be stamped at any time. They don't operate like middle class people.
  2. The owners of the Cards, Reds, Pirates, and Astros? McLane, maybe. I don't know anything about the other owners. Can I make the assumption that generally speaking, owners votes should be independent of competitive balance? In other words, did Steinbrenner vote yes to the new Red Sox ownership? Or does that only work in theory, since some guys have petty personal vendettas? I would think so. Otherwise, how did John Henry get approved? John Henry owned the Marlins after Wayne Huizenga sold them, but before that he's been an owner of several other sports franchieses and was an investor/minority owner of the Yankees. The dude knows how to build a winner. The head scratcher is Jeff Loria. The guy is right up there with the Fords, and the dude who owns the Clippers as far a crappy ownership goes. He ran the Expos into the ground and now he is doing it to the Marlins. But Loria turns a tidy profit at a low cost and that's what MLB wants.
  3. Who's this board person? What different would you have Perry do? He can't make Lou play Murton. He can't make Soriano not swing at crap and hit an occasional lead-off HR. I haven't been impressed but I don't get where you are coming from at all.
  4. How's Soto's English? Guys who don't speak good English sometimes come off as jerks. Anyway, who gives a crap? I never got into the hero worsphip and my suggestion to any parent would be to try not to let your child get into it either.
  5. Andruw shouldn't. He's a good player. He's put up a 121 or better OPS+ in 4 of the last 6 years, including his horrible 2007. The other year (2004) his OPS+ was 113. He's still only 30, so it's not even close to being out of the realm that he could produce like his 2005-06 seasons, which would make him the best offensive player on the current Cubs team. If you don't want to sign him because he'll probably get a Soriano-like contract that will bite a team in the rear near the end of it, then I understand, but to lump him in with Hunter, who is severely inferior, is wrong. Jones is so money he doesn't even know it, except he knows it. I'd trade Soriano's contract for what Jones will get this year, any day. Jones is the right player at the wrong time for the Cubs.
  6. I'm thinking of the show Around the Horn. I think I've watched about 30 seconds of that show.
  7. This is related to the fact that the awful Jim Hendry and most of his predecessors almost always assembled offenses that would be marginally OK as long as everybody in the lineup was contributing. If any one spot was a zero, the offense would collapse. That resulted in the manager never having the "luxury" of running a struggling rookie out there for three months straight. I think that is a very good point. Cedeno and Pie could very well turn out to be bench players, but I can guarentee anyone they WILL BE bench players if they never get a decent shot at starting without having to look over their shoulder after every miscue or strikeout.
  8. I doubt you get toasted for that. Theriot's really not good, despite whatever "grit" he may possess. If the Cubs can't land a big-time SS, I'll hope for Cedeno to figure things out and supplant Theriot. I hope Cedeno can figure out things too, but so far he has looked like the epitome of a AAAA hitter. In which 1/16 of the season are you talking about? I really am sick of this crap. Most every player has an adjustment period when moving up but somehow the Cubs and their fans expect the player to put up exactly the same numbers they have in the minors right away. It doesn't happen very often.
  9. I assume the A-Rod to the Cubs rumors will start. Lou will not go to NY and manage and if Torre is fired A-Rod may reconsider his options. I know I wouldn't want to play for Joe Rah' Rah' Girardi who's likely next in line.
  10. How in the wide, wide, world of sports can you say that? He's been given a handful of sporatic ABs while being a defensive replacement for almost the entire year. [this comment does not pertain directly to DKWG's post] It is the same crap again and again with our young players. A young player gets a handful of sporatic ABs during the year and "they can't hit major league pitching". Thank Soto has mashes the ball so far. I just don't understand the logic.
  11. My highly uninformed opinion is that not much will change next year b/c the new owner will takeover in the winter. I imagine everyone will be retained unless someone really pees in the punchbowl at the Welcome New Owner Party. If big changes are going to be made they likely will be before the 2009 season unless the Cubs completely flop in the first half of 2008. I am really worried about who will own the Cubs. If the owner is "good for baseball" I fear he will be bad for Cub fans, b/c that will mean he's in tight with Rinesdorf and Selig. Which brings me to my next gripe/question. Why should Rinesdorf, Selig, or any owner have a say in who ownes the Chicago National League Ball Club? I mean, from a business standpoint Rinsesdorf is a direct competitor of the Cubs. I think he'd love to see a dip in popularity. Anyway, those are my 2 cents.
  12. You're assuming the next ownership will be better? Be careful what you wish for. Exactly.
  13. Ugly child phenomenon. They always feel unloved and resent that the pretty child gets all the swag.
  14. I don't understand your point. I thought its a forgone conclusion that he'll opt out no matter what. Teams who are interested in him know the price tag will be $30M/year, and they probably wont put too much emphasis on his post season disappointments. FTR, I do not think the Cubs will pursue him (due to ownership change/hold up and overall payroll). It is not a forgone conclusion. A $30M/year price tag would pretty much put him out of any team's price range. I think A-Rod will stay in NY. The NYY fans may be schizophrenic, but neither A-Rod nor Cashman are.
  15. Lou is completely crapping the bed in this playoff run. Oh well, the Cubs will be in another playoff in about 7 years.* *Based on average over the last 103 years.
  16. He should probably start with his own (ass). True, but most of the blame, in my opinion, still has to go on Soriano/Lee/Ramirez. 2 feet < 3 asses. Lou's got a problem. Get Izturis back on the roster to jam a fist in to Aramis.
  17. What? So soon? His days as a prospect are numbered then too.
  18. I voted for gravy
  19. Bullpucky. My argument does not require that Lilly had time to reflect. It requires only that Lilly have spent time training himself to control his reactions. actually, no. Testosterone + Nerves + Embarrassment + Hugely important situation + no self control = violent outburst Lilly has been on of the best pitchers at controlling his externalizing behaviors this year. Getting pissed off at giving up a 3 run jack is pretty understandable. I think the entire Cubs team and their manager are playing tight, playing not to loose, if you will. They are taking pitches they should be swininging at and swinging at pitches they should be taking. You just can't do that sort of thing and expect to win a playoff game. Especially Soriano, it is one of the things that got him traded from the Bronx a few years ago
  20. I wish I didn't have that last 3 beers.
  21. The Cubs are going to smack that silly soul patch right off of Davis's ugly mug.
  22. We have 16 winners!!!!
  23. Webb was dealing last night. Lou probably took out Z too soon (He managed tight), but I don't know that it mattered. What was somewhat shocking to me was all of the first pitch strikes the Cubs took. I really thought they'd get to Webb becuase they are so aggressive, but almost to a man they showed patience last night. Maybe they were pressing too, I don't know. It's only one game, I really expect the Cubs to take this seires, two mistakes up in the zone and across the heart of the plate cost the Cubs the game, not much else was hit hard. On the other hand, the Cubs hit some at-em balls. The Cubs had a little bad luck last night and were facing a pitcher who was on. They'll get them tonight, I have no doubt.
  24. seriously, who is the color guy? Terrible. F. Ron Darling, and he's not that bad.
  25. Webb is on. The Cubs are frustratingly patient. Where are the hackers I love? Z looks great.
×
×
  • Create New...