I beg to differ. I don't see how he's better than Hendry. That's my read. At first glance it seems crazy that LaMar could even be considered...but the timing of him resigning, the connection to Gillick, who probably hired him with Philly and would certainly recommend him to Ricketts, the Wilken connection to both Gillick and LaMar, and last but not least....the Sandberg connection. This...really...could...play...out. the sky is falling! look, most of the candidates that ricketts would want to talk to are probably off limits right now. epstein's team is going to the playoffs, friedman is still under contract as his team's GM, and several other assistant GMs are still working on the 2011 season. the cubs are a bad team, the trade deadline is past and realistically there won't be a waiver deal at this stage. so there's no urgency whatsoever to replace randy bush in the next month. why the crap would they just go out and hire chuck lamar as their GM in early september? not to mention the part where you don't fire jim hendry, who wasn't good but also wasn't a disaster, to bring in a guy who had a .400 winning percentage during his tenure as GM. it makes way more sense to hire an up-and-coming guy that it does to hire a guy like chuck lamar. ricketts wants to make a splash, not hire some crappy retread.