I think they gave up way too much here, but I'm not going to compare Cahill to Wells. I know their stats are probably similar, but Cahill will be younger for the next couple of seasons than Wells was before he even made his debut in the bigs. Maybe if Wells hadn't caught for so long, I could see this as a good comp. But I do expect Cahill to still improve from here on out. But he's not worth Parker, not by any stretch. I have to say, it seems that to a lot of people on this board if a finesse pitcher isn't Greg Maddux their automatically Randy Wells or worse, but there's plenty of room in between. I remember the same arguement against Jair Jurrjens, since he's not a stuff guy that we don't want him. I'd be happy to get either Cahill or Jurrjens and think either would be the 2nd best guy in our rotation, and that's not a knock on Dempster and Zambrano. cahill's performance in 2010 was a babip (.236!) mirage. he outperformed his expected ERA by at least a full run. dempster is quite obviously a better pitcher than him in a luck-neutral world.