Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • This Sucks, But Dansby Swanson Has Been Terrible in the Clutch All Season


    Matt Trueblood

    In yet another gut punch of a loss Sunday night, the Cubs' offense continued to deftly avoid the big hit like it was their ex at a mutual friend's Labor Day cookout. One member of the team has positively bolted the party every time the clutch hit even feels nearby, though, and it's a major bummer.

    Image courtesy of © Ron Chenoy-USA TODAY Sports

    Cubs Video

     

    No one wants to feel badly about Dansby Swanson's first year with the Cubs. He's been awesome. He's been delightful. His defensive play at shortstop is even better than advertised, and his leadership is surely one reason why the team even reached September in position to play meaningful games. He's one of the unqualified success stories of this season. If we're going to properly diagnose this team's inability to come up with the hits they need to win close games, though, we have to talk about this: Swanson has been dreadful in important at-bats, all year.

    Swanson has come to the plate 81 times in Late and Close situations this year, according to Baseball Reference. (That means it was at least the seventh inning, and the tying run was at least on deck, or else the Cubs led by no more than one.) He's batted .151/.235/.192 in those situations, without a home run. He's hitting .235/.309/.378 in 110 high-leverage plate appearances. He owns a .640 OPS in innings 7-9, and he's 0-for-7 with a walk in extra innings. He's got a .660 OPS against relievers, overall.

    It's not fair to Swanson to pull out these numbers and blame him for the Cubs' undoing, here. After all, that might not even be what this is. It might merely be the last trial of the insanely resilient, impossibly impossible 2023 Cubs. They might roar back, lock up a Wild Card berth, and even make a run into the postseason. Nor is it likely that this says anything permanent about him as a clutch hitter. The samples here are quite small. They could change with one mighty hot streak to close the season, and if he had such a clutch heater, it would probably be the thing that put the Cubs over the top and into the playoffs.

    Nonetheless, these numbers (and the much more visceral reality they describe) are an important part of the story of this season, at this point. Swanson is, by far, the player on the roster in whom the team has the most invested. He wasn't brought in to anchor the offense, and his overall production has been adequate, but if we don't at least acknowledge his futility in crucial at-bats, we'll end up placing blame somewhere else--and it's likely to be somewhere even more unfair, because it will be less rooted in objective truth. Cody Bellinger hit into a devastating double play in the third inning Sunday night, but Bellinger has been the engine of the team's offense. He owns a 2.8 Win Probability Added (WPA) for the year. His at-bats have, on balance, added that many wins to the Cubs' ledger, relative to an exactly average theoretical outcome for each of them. That leads the Cubs by a wide margin.

    Swanson doesn't quite take up the rear in that statistical category, but it's fair to say that he keeps dubious company. Three Cubs hitters have hurt the team's Win Probability more than Swanson (-0.6) this year: Trey Mancini, Miguel Amaya, and Tucker Barnhart. Amaya's offensive struggles down the stretch have been very unfortunate, but he's a rookie playing infrequently, trying to manage the responsibilities of being a backup catcher for a contending team with a thinning pitching staff. You know what happened to Mancini and Barnhart.

    I can recommend adjustments, mentally and physically. Swanson pulls off the ball too often when he comes up in important situations. Trying to pull the ball and play the hero, ironically, he thwarts that very objective. I covered that aspect of things in the piece I wrote 10 days ago about Swanson's struggles. It runs deeper than just getting pull-happy, though. Swanson also seems overly aggressive, in general.

    He has a .631 OPS in plate appearances in which he swings at the first pitch, which is 28 percent worse than the league does when they do so, on average. When he takes the first pitch, his OPS is .812--21 percent better than average. Yet, he swings at 33.5 percent of first pitches, which is solidly higher than the league average. He needs to take a more patient tack. Even if he falls behind on called strikes, he might get a better look and a better idea of how to square up the next pitch. The payoff of early-count swinging for him this season has been miserable, so he needs to adjust.

    Neither of those changes are as easy to make as they are to prescribe, though, and even if he made them, he might be no better off. A lot of this is bad luck, or at least bad luck frosting on a cake made of imperfect process. There's no easy five here, and there's no value in vilifying the man who every Cubs fans hopes has another half-decade of fruitful time in Wrigleyville ahead of him. It just has to be out there. The Cubs keep losing, and inarguably, this is a significant reason why. 

     

    Think you could write a story like this? North Side Baseball wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.

    MORE FROM NORTH SIDE BASEBALL
    — Latest Cubs coverage from our writers
    — Recent Cubs discussion in our forums
    — Follow NSBB via Twitter, Facebook or email
    — Become a North Side Baseball Caretaker

     Share


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Featured Comments

    He's the star that Jed and Co. targeted this offseason. That's an indictment in itself. The first warning sign is when a good organization chooses to move on from a player. But there are always teams like the Cubs to throw a lot of money at "leadership" skills.  

    • Haha 1
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    41 minutes ago, CubinNY said:

    He's the star that Jed and Co. targeted this offseason. That's an indictment in itself. The first warning sign is when a good organization chooses to move on from a player. But there are always teams like the Cubs to throw a lot of money at "leadership" skills.  

    Yeah he only leads the FA alternatives at SS in fWAR, xwOBA, EVs, BB%, hard hit, barrels, is by far the best defender, etc etc etc…Woooooooe are we 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 minutes ago, TomtheBombadil said:

    Yeah he only leads the FA alternatives at SS in fWAR, xwOBA, EVs, BB%, hard hit, barrels, is by far the best defender, etc etc etc…Woooooooe are we 

    The majority of his value is tied to his defense. 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I also worry that the offensive struggles are getting in his head now and impacting his defensive performance as well.  It is entirely possibly that the defensive miscues are just an unfortunately timed outlier, but it sure seems like he it out of sorts in the field right now.  Whether it is getting caught in between and letting the game's potential final out drop on Saturday, or trying to do to much and get a force out and second base that wasn't there on Sunday, he has been making some uncharacteristics mistakes lately.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    9 minutes ago, CubinNY said:

    The majority of his value is tied to his defense. 

    Oh that sounds so bad and 100% true…Wooooe is us 

    Even if it is, and I wouldn’t necessarily agree…Why would that be bad from the starting SS? It’s not like he can’t hit so much as he hasn’t met whatever he was supposed to do or however the thinking works 

    I see a player who has established a very high floor, on both sides of the ball, for both he and Cubs. I see a player who has done that after opening his Cubs career with an oblique injury that likely didn’t fully heal before opening day, and doesn’t offer it as an excuse (though that would just draw ire lol)

    Edited by TomtheBombadil
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, TomtheBombadil said:

    Yeah he only leads the FA alternatives at SS in fWAR, xwOBA, EVs, BB%, hard hit, barrels, is by far the best defender, etc etc etc…Woooooooe are we 

    yay the cubs got ripped off less than the twins. another win for jed.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    What are his high leverage numbers like for his career?  Is it just a one year blip or is this something we'll have to deal with for 6 more years?  My understanding is that the general belief is still that there is not a clutch hitting skill and WPA changes from year to year for an individual player. 

    Fake Edit:  I did the work, somewhat

    Career:  .740 (.750 this year)

    Late & Close: .730 (.683)

    2 outs, RISP: .782 (.683)

    High Leverage: .802 (.680)

    Innings 7-9: .739 (.636)

    Vs. Relievers: .745 (.654)

     

    So it looks like for his career he hits roughly the same in "big spots" as he does in other situations, just not this season.  Though when digging, I found that he was actually significantly above average in a lot of these categories his first 5 seasons and has had numbers like this years for the last 3 seasons (2021, 2022, 2023).  No idea why there is such a sudden shift, but there's at least some evidence using 3 years of data that Swanson is doing something different in clutch situations.

    Even if clutch hitting isnt a thing, while he slumps like he has for the last 6 weeks he should be hitting 7th in the order, not directly between Bellinger and Seiya.  He's come up in a lot of big spots and has been pretty much worthless to the team in those spots lately.

     

    Edited by UMFan83
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

         Ok, I think we got a few conflicting expectations here, and I get it, we are all frustrated here. This team is on the cusp of having the proverbial rug pulled out from under our feet. We are looking for someone to blame so we can rationalize why the team is not performing up to expectations. Defensively, Swanson and Hoerner may just be the finest tandem in the league this year. Offensively, while Swanson's #'s are pretty good, I don't think he's the guy who puts the team on his back and says we got this. This team doesn't have that one guy in the line-up. The one who consistently hits about .270 with 35 hr and 90 RBI. We are hoping one or two of the kids grow into that role. What we have is a plethora of pretty good support players (Bellinger, Swanson, Happ, Suzuki, maybe even Morel) I left Wisdom out of the equation because he has way too much swing and miss in his stroke. But, that said he can get in a groove and go yard with the best of them. Did anybody else think he got all of it Sunday night? I usually don't get fooled, but I did Sunday night. I thought he launched one. Pitching has been a bit under the bar as of late too. That happens. We saw Steele get smacked around a bit as well as Hendricks. We knew eventually Jordan Wicks would get "Charlie-Browned" it happens to all of them, it's just the timing is bad. The bullpen has been caving in a bit, but with Alzolay and Fulmer on the shelf it should not be a surprise. We have gotten some decent pitching out of the pen from our former starters. I am speaking of Smyly and Stroman here. Are the band-aids falling off of this collection? I don't know, I'd like to think not and that this is just a phase. I watch each game in the hopes that the boys put on their hitting shoes and start scalding the ball again. I was hoping that by now, some of our Iowa talent would have shown through and made an impact. Maybe that still is going to happen, but were running out of clock. I think we have the talent to have a good home-stand here. I think 5-1 or 4-2 is a possibility. It needs to be that good though because dominant series wins over Atlanta and Milwaukee is a big ask. Basically these next six games are our season. So simply put, if the boys get hot, all will be good and my neighbors won't be trying to talk me down off the ledge next week. 🙂

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    5 hours ago, CubinNY said:

    The majority of his value is tied to his defense. 

    So it's not exactly linear to total bWAR, but he averages 2.7 oWAR to 1.4 dWAR annually, so that's wildly inaccurate.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    What the horsefeathers happened to the flyballs that were a large part of the draw to adding his bat? He has had a FB rate over 40% for 2 years straight and a rate over 37% for 5 consecutive years. Yet here he is with the Cubs posting his worst FB rate since 2017 and a consequent GB rate of 45%, highest since the same year. 

     

    Why are the Cubs struggling so mightily to get the ball off the ground? 

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    2 hours ago, We Got The Whole 9 said:

    What the horsefeathers happened to the flyballs that were a large part of the draw to adding his bat? He has had a FB rate over 40% for 2 years straight and a rate over 37% for 5 consecutive years. Yet here he is with the Cubs posting his worst FB rate since 2017 and a consequent GB rate of 45%, highest since the same year. 

     

    Why are the Cubs struggling so mightily to get the ball off the ground? 

    I’ve assumed it’s probably not a coincidence he and Suzuki hurt their obliques, came back pretty fast, and both have struggled in this area 

    Cubs were fine when they had stars IIRC and should consider adding more 

    Edited by TomtheBombadil
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites



    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...