Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Cubs News & Analysis

    Let's Talk About the Cubs' Options With Regard to Kyle Hendricks


    Matthew Trueblood

    The offseason won't kick off in earnest for another three weeks, but the Cubs have all the information they're going to get in order to make some important decisions. First on that list is the choice of whether to retain their longest-tenured player.

    Image courtesy of © John Jones-USA TODAY Sports

    Cubs Video

    Under the terms of the long-term contract to which the Cubs signed Kyle Hendricks in March 2019, they hold a $16-million option on his services for 2024. A year ago, that looked unlikely to be picked up, but he had a solid 2023. That changes the calculus quite a bit, because $16 million doesn't buy what it used to. Besides, thanks to a buyout worth $1.5 million, it's really a $14.5-million decision for them.

    The Chicago rotation already has Justin Steele and Jameson Taillon firmly in place for 2024. Marcus Stroman is the one with a decision to make about his future, rather than the Cubs having one. Drew Smyly is under contract for 2024, though the team surely hopes they can relegate him to the bullpen, given what we saw in 2023. Jordan Wicks and Javier Assad, on the other hand, have earned the right to vie for places in the rotation to begin the season. 

    That gives the team a fairly crowded rotation depth chart, which would tend to nudge you toward cutting Hendricks loose. On the other hand, in 2023, he pitched more innings (137) than all but Steele, Taillon, and Smyly, and had a lower ERA (3.74) than all but Steele and Assad. He not only returned from a career-endangering shoulder injury, but looked as good as he has since 2020. His walk rate was a minuscule 4.7 percent, and he induced weak contact at one of the best rates in baseball. 

    Those are both fragile skills, though--at least at this stage of Hendricks's career. He will always run better-than-average walk and hard-hit rates, because of the nature of his approach, but to repeat (or even approximate) the numbers he put up in 2023, he'd need to remain nearly elite in those categories. That's hard to do, for a few reasons. First, limiting hard contact isn't a very sticky skill. Pitchers' rates don't correlate well year-to-year, even if one confines the sample to hurlers who had at least 250 batted balls against them in each of two consecutive seasons.

    Hard Hit Rate, Year-to-Year Correlation, 2021-23.png

    Second, Hendricks's low walk rate comes despite the fact that he doesn't throw very many strikes. Of 100 qualifying pitchers, Hendricks had the seventh-lowest Zone% in 2023. He relies on batters expanding the zone a little bit in order to keep that walk rate down, and while his stuff and command do encourage that, it's a hard thing to do on a long-term basis. Hendricks also faces a major hurdle, in that he really doesn't miss bats. Between nibbling so much (of necessity) and getting whiffs on just over 21 percent of swings, Hendricks's strikeout rate fell to 16.1 percent last year--his lowest clip since his rookie campaign of 2014.

    According to Baseball Prospectus's Deserved Run Average, which accounts for park factors, opponent quality, handedness matchups and other factors on a granular basis, Hendricks was actually a below-average pitcher last year. His batted-ball data and that low walk rate made some of his other peripheral statistics look good, but DRA debits him quite a bit for the lack of strikeouts. It even accounts for the above: Hendricks is only credited with 88 deserved strikeouts (against 93 actual ones) and he's saddled with 32 deserved walks (against 27 actual free passes). 

    If we accept the fact that Hendricks's hard-hit rate, walk rate, and strikeout rate are all likely to regress somewhat, it gets much less clear that he should come back in 2024--at least for $16 million. To those facts, add this one: shoulder capsular injuries like the one that sidelined Hendricks for the second half of 2022 and the first month and a half of 2023 have a tendency to recur. He survived that brush with pitching oblivion, but history suggests that he might get hurt again soon. 

    However, Hendricks is important to the organization. He's the link to the championship team. He's also a valued mentor and exemplar for the team's younger hurlers. The Cubs can't afford to keep him at the price set by his option terms. If possible, though, they should explore an extension to replace that deal. Last winter, Smyly signed a two-year deal worth $19 million, with incentives that could (and did) push the value higher and a team option for the third year. Hendricks is in a strikingly similar position right now. His superior track record and the relationship between team and player probably means he would command $11 million per year on a similar contract, instead of $9.5 million, but even that number represents a meaningful discount from the price tag on the option.

    As I wrote last week, the Cubs need to build a deep rotation for 2024. They should be ready to use six starters at a time, which means having eight or nine viable arms lined up going into spring training. Hendricks can be a valuable part of that. It just isn't going to work without a bit of maneuvering to get his price down, thereby creating more space for them to operate beneath whatever ceiling ownership puts on their winter spending.

    Follow North Side Baseball For Chicago Cubs News & Analysis

    • Like 1

    Recent Cubs Articles

    Recent Cubs Videos


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Rcal10

    Posted

    42 minutes ago, KCCub said:

    They absolutely need a TOR, I don’t think there’s any question about that. 

    The issue is if Stroman comes back and they sign Hendricks they have 4 veterans in the rotation. And the payroll of the rotation is pretty high. You then have Wicks, Aasad and Wesnecki as well as other young guys soon to be on the tram. They may justify not going after a TOR guy because of what they have. That is my concern if they keep Hendricks. 

    KCCub

    Posted

    7 minutes ago, Rcal10 said:

    The issue is if Stroman comes back and they sign Hendricks they have 4 veterans in the rotation. And the payroll of the rotation is pretty high. You then have Wicks, Aasad and Wesnecki as well as other young guys soon to be on the tram. They may justify not going after a TOR guy because of what they have. That is my concern if they keep Hendricks. 

    That would be poor management if they use extending Hendricks on a cheaper AAV contract as justification for not going after a TOR. Especially knowing Stroman is only on the books for one year. This year has showed us teams need a plethora of SP, with injuries being at an all time high. They can do it by FA or via a trade, but adding a TORP is a must this off-season imo. 

    Backtobanks

    Posted

    53 minutes ago, Rcal10 said:

    The issue is if Stroman comes back and they sign Hendricks they have 4 veterans in the rotation. And the payroll of the rotation is pretty high. You then have Wicks, Aasad and Wesnecki as well as other young guys soon to be on the tram. They may justify not going after a TOR guy because of what they have. That is my concern if they keep Hendricks. 

    Wicks or Wesnecki could be part of a package for a TOR starter.

    Rcal10

    Posted

    50 minutes ago, KCCub said:

    That would be poor management if they use extending Hendricks on a cheaper AAV contract as justification for not going after a TOR. Especially knowing Stroman is only on the books for one year. This year has showed us teams need a plethora of SP, with injuries being at an all time high. They can do it by FA or via a trade, but adding a TORP is a must this off-season imo. 

    Not going to get an argument out of me. I agree 100%. But I also have followed this team a long time. And I have seen how the FO and ownership work. My concern will be the FO suggesting they like their young guys to fill whatever spots they need. 

    • Like 1
    Stratos

    Posted

    10 hours ago, Rcal10 said:

    Probably more wishful thinking than anything else, tbh. However I do feel at times we tend to write a guy out the first sign of decline. And often it is just nagging injuries. If you look at those years, actually Kyle was only bad for the last 2 months of 21’ and then bad in only 16 starts in 22’, when they finally took him out of the rotation and put him on the IL for good. In 21’ he was trending towards a typical Kyle year. At the end of July he was at a 3.71 era. I think between losing all the guys you played with for so long and just being on a bad team that last 2 months of the season was more of an anomoly. As for 22’ if I remember correctly (and I may not) I feel he had nagging problems all year until they finally decided he has enough to get him out of the rotation. I just feel last year was more of the old Kyle and I also feel it is more likely repeated than his last half of 21’ and the 22’ season. I think he will be much closer to a 3.50 guy than a 4.80 guy. So a number 3 or very good #4 starter. 
    But, again, the issue with me is the Cubs need a frond or the rotation guy. So even a decent Kyle may not be worth signing if it prevents them from going after a TOR guy. 

    Kyle was essentially batting practice (around 7.40 ERA) over 3 of the 6 months in 2021, and was bad in 2 of 3 months in 2022.  We can't go on assumptions and feelings even though we love the guy, we only have the numbers to go by, and he was pitching poorly.

    This is also an assumption, but I think it's possible they rode him too hard in 2021 after COVID.  He only pitched 81 IP in the COVID shortened 2020 season, then they pitched him 181 IP in 2021.  Your muscles etc can atrophy if you aren't pitching as much, his arm may not have been able to handle a full season load in 2021 like previous seasons, which may have caused the injury, and hurt his effectiveness in the last 2 months of 2021 when he was horrible because he might have been gassed.

    Anyways, it's all speculation.  It could be age as well, who knows, fans only have the #'s to go by, and there's some red flags.  The K rate was also down last year.

    Cuzi

    Posted

    On 10/22/2023 at 12:51 PM, Rcal10 said:

    The issue is if Stroman comes back and they sign Hendricks they have 4 veterans in the rotation. And the payroll of the rotation is pretty high. You then have Wicks, Aasad and Wesnecki as well as other young guys soon to be on the tram. They may justify not going after a TOR guy because of what they have. That is my concern if they keep Hendricks. 

    There's a simple solution. If Stroman opts in, you trade Stroman.

    squally1313

    Posted

    1 hour ago, Cuzi said:

    There's a simple solution. If Stroman opts in, you trade Stroman.

    For what

    Cuzi

    Posted

    10 minutes ago, squally1313 said:

    For what

    Any number of directions. There's plenty of teams out there trying to compete that could use Stroman.

    The Twins rotation is about to get gutted

    Orioles

    Red Sox

    Yankees

    Take your pick. The Cubs have a handful of Stromans in their rotation. If him opting in creates such a problem for the budget then get rid of him. They signed him to trade him in the future in the first place. Its why he got 2 years and no NTC.

    Transmogrified Tiger

    Posted

    On 10/22/2023 at 12:51 PM, Rcal10 said:

    The issue is if Stroman comes back and they sign Hendricks they have 4 veterans in the rotation. And the payroll of the rotation is pretty high. You then have Wicks, Aasad and Wesnecki as well as other young guys soon to be on the tram. They may justify not going after a TOR guy because of what they have. That is my concern if they keep Hendricks. 

    The Cubs had 8 different guys start at least 7 games last year, they can't and won't be afraid of not having a clear opening for Wicks or other younger SP in the opening day rotation because it's certain that will come through injury or ineffectiveness.  The bigger problem is not of rotation slots but simply the likely amount of money they have to spend in total.  Unless you find a really smart trade for a strong SP without much cost, it gets hard to both add that additional SP and make the investments they want to make in the offense and the pen.

    CubinNY

    Posted

    On 10/22/2023 at 1:46 PM, Backtobanks said:

    Wicks or Wesnecki could be part of a package for a TOR starter.

    Wesnescki has no trade value whatsoever. 

    Transmogrified Tiger

    Posted

    you can just say you don't think Wesneski has much trade value, you don't have to exaggerate with absolutist language that is obviously not true.

    CubinNY

    Posted

    10 minutes ago, Transmogrified Tiger said:

    you can just say you don't think Wesneski has much trade value, you don't have to exaggerate with absolutist language that is obviously not true.

    sorry, Wesneski doesn't have very much trade value. Or what the Cubs would likely get for him will not help them in the short term and probably not the long term either. He's a failed starter who can't get LHH out. Unless he can reinvent himself like Adbert, he's fungible.

    Billy62

    Posted (edited)

    On 10/20/2023 at 5:47 PM, Rcal10 said:

    That $25M for Bellinger is not the teams option. The only person who will decide on Bellinger is Bellinger. And he isn’t going to come back for the one year. 

    I think what we saw from Bellinger this season was the real Cody Bellinger. I know he is going to be expensive, but if you want to build a winner, it will be a short list of people you want to build around. I don't want to see the Cubs get wrapped up in another bank-breaking long-term deal like they did with Soriano. But three-four years might be an option. I would hate to just lose a player of this caliber to a higher bidder.

    Edited by Billy62
    missed word



    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...