Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Cubs News & Analysis

    Let's Not Let the Prospect of Bringing Back Cody Bellinger Lose Its Sizzle


    Matthew Trueblood

    With two brand-name targets for external acquisitions by the boards and another two seemingly on the verge of the same, the Cubs are circling toward a reunion with their breakout star of 2023. Don't be tempted into thinking of that as a consolation prize.

    Image courtesy of © Michael McLoone-USA TODAY Sports

    Cubs Video

    I've said this in a couple of places recently, but in my opinion, the Cubs' goal this winter ought not to be to project for a certain number of wins or to be obvious favorites in the NL Central. Rather, the goal should be to add at least two players who project to be comfortably above-average, for multiple seasons. In fact, that should be the goal most winters. Flexibility is good, and Jed Hoyer is good at maintaining it, but a team can't gain the kind of traction the Cubs need to gain without committing to (and securing a commitment from, unless they're under team control anyway) good players for the medium or long term.

    In fact, that's what Hoyer has been trying to do over the last couple winters, anyway. Two years ago, around the lockout, he signed both Marcus Stroman and Seiya Suzuki. Just last year, it was Dansby Swanson and Jameson Taillon. That's on top of moves like the extensions the team signed with Nico Hoerner and Ian Happ in the spring. They're building this roster out by committing to these guys for long enough to truly build around them, instead of having to replace them just when they start to get their feet under them.

    That brings us around to Cody Bellinger, because he, too, signed with the Cubs last winter, but it wasn't the same kind of deal. He delivered real value, but it was on a one-year deal, so now that value has burned itself out. Now, after the Cubs missed out (however voluntarily, or not) on Shohei Ohtani and Juan Soto and with their hopes of acquiring Yoshinobu Yamamoto or Tyler Glasnow looking very dim, rumors of Bellinger and the Cubs reuniting are starting to percolate.

    It's hard, emotionally, not to think of that possibility as an unsatisfying status quo kind of move. We've well established the risk of regression for Bellinger, based on his underlying performance indicators. Soto and Ohtani each would have represented major upgrades, and Yamamoto would be a level of impact player above what Bellinger has been in any season save his MVP campaign in 2019. After not landing any of them, bringing back Bellinger would feel like a lateral move at the worst time--at least narratively.

    Instead, try to imagine that Bellinger is an equally young, equally versatile, equally graceful left-handed power hitter. Imagine him as a free agent without draft pick compensation attached, since by re-signing him, the Cubs would lose only the opportunity to gain an extra pick if he signed elsewhere instead. Whereas Bellinger was just in Chicago on a pillow deal in 2023, if he comes back now, it would be on a contract lasting at least six or seven years. It would be a long-term commitment between the two sides, and even if that makes fans a bit nervous, it should also excite them. 

    Bellinger, were he to return now, would be a fixture at first base for the team for the foreseeable future. He'd be the first Cub to officially be on the books into the next decade. It's unlikely that a move will come together unless Bellinger's asking price falls down to $25 million or so in annual average value, which means that (especially in five years or so) it needn't be the top salary on the roster. There really wouldn't be inordinate pressure on Bellinger to rejuvenate himself further, or to recapture that 2019 form. He'd just need to approximate what we just saw from him in 2023, and he would be able to do it with the security and fan affection that comes with that kind of long-term deal.

    Slot Bellinger in that way, and a little of the pressure on the team's scouting and player-development systems also abates. The team's capacity to trade from their depth on the farm system, especially with regard to position players, would increase just a bit. Bellinger would still be a good fit with the Cubs, if his market doesn't take off the way he and Scott Boras have hoped. It would help the team establish its long-term core.

    I'm not sure who either of the Cubs' long-term, above-average acquisitions this winter will be. They're likely to be active in the trade market, and they have plenty of money to spend. There are other free agents in whom they might have active interest, beyond Bellinger, like Jordan Montgomery or Matt Chapman. If they do end up reupping with their best player from the season just past, though, they'll have done something bigger than they did by bringing him in the first time, and we shouldn't lose sight of that fact.

    Follow North Side Baseball For Chicago Cubs News & Analysis

    Recent Cubs Articles

    Recent Cubs Videos


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Transmogrified Tiger

    Posted

    Oh one other thing on this that really informs my thinking.  From the 3 OF spots, 1B, and DH you need 810 games each year.  Even if you have 6 guys you love for those spots, with equal playing time they're still averaging 135 games each, and less than 4 players per team exceeded that mark last year.  Injuries, rest, matchups, and poor performance will happen,  so I'm not really cowed by him not being an insanely snug fit on Day 1.  Doubly so in the case of someone like Bellinger with a well rounded profile and doesn't need to be signed until he's 38.

    • Like 2
    Bertz

    Posted

    33 minutes ago, Transmogrified Tiger said:

    I don't want to be a broken record about this or trivialize that it would be a somewhat tricky management challenge(earn your money Craig, I guess?), but Bellinger can play RF and Seiya can DH.  For that matter, maybe Seiya *should* DH given how he's graded out at the position over 2 years and how much emphasis the roster has around defense.  And even if you're convinced the 'if PCA hits' outcome is definitely 1B, don't forget that Bellinger adds value above the typical 1B with his speed, and as such even with offensive regression would still be around a 3 win 1B.  I understand how that may not be optimal given the power composition of the rest of the lineup, but it doesn't scare me off making the upgrade if that's what's there.  Though I am on the team that doesn't want PCA up until Memorial Day and am trying to remind myself that the odds are decent he's a platoon or worse bat in a lot of different outcomes.

    It just feels like a lot to accommodate a what by most estimations looks like a good-not-great bat? 

    I'm probably overstating how likely it is that one of PCA, Canario, Alcantara, etc. are a first division starter within the next 18 months.  But even if you want to pick apart the internal options, it's just not that hard to find a CF on the market currently.  Tyler O'neill, Manuel Margot, Cedric Mullins, Mike Yastrzemski, and Trent Grisham all hit the FA next offseason or the offseason after (and thus potentially the trade block before that).  I'd prefer Bellinger to any of those guys, but not by enough to lock into  2027-2029 Bellinger.

    Mainly I think you're just more bullish on Bellinger's bat than I am. The juice is worth the squeeze for a ~125 wRC+ where it's just simply not for a ~110.  The argument for the former isn't crazy.  You've laid out some good points previously, and there's also the Isaac Paredes pulled flyballs stuff.  But the totality of what I've seen has me expecting the latter.

    • Like 2
    Layoutman

    Posted

    Just don't think Jed is going to trade PCA - period.  PCA is cheap and should provide GG caliber defense up the middle with years of team control. Hopefully being humbled during his first ML stint will bring the needed changes for him.  

     

    Transmogrified Tiger

    Posted

    41 minutes ago, Bertz said:

    Mainly I think you're just more bullish on Bellinger's bat than I am. The juice is worth the squeeze for a ~125 wRC+ where it's just simply not for a ~110.  The argument for the former isn't crazy.  You've laid out some good points previously, and there's also the Isaac Paredes pulled flyballs stuff.  But the totality of what I've seen has me expecting the latter.

    Yeah there's two main points here.  One is 'how good is Bellinger's bat', and I'm not gonna tell people 'no absolutely not he's a 125 wRC+ hitter for sure' if you're super worried about the batted ball peripherals, even if I disagree.  The other is 'even if he hits he's not a great fit since we have PCA and a ~120 wRC+ is only okay for 1B', and that one I structurally think is incorrect given the lack of certainty from PCA, the value he would actually add at 1B, and the practical upshot of what positional needs the team has.

    • Like 1
    Maddux31

    Posted

    Bellinger scares me. He’s been injury prone and is long and lanky, with a lot going on with his swing that could easily get out of sync. But those batted ball numbers are what scares me the most. There just isn’t anything there to like. And defense often begins to slide when a player hits his early 30s.

    That all said, it’s not hard to imagine getting to late January with the Cubs still desperate for a bat and Jed overpaying Bellinger in terms of both AAV and years.

    I guess 6/150 would be palatable (barely), but I think it’s a big risk. The question might end up being, however, “Is it a risk the Cubs can afford NOT to take?”

    Backtobanks

    Posted

    One reason to trade PCA is that he has the highest trade value on the Cubs.  A couple of hypothetical trades from MLBTV would certainly fill most of the major holes on the team.

    Wesneski + PCA for Bieber + Clase + Naylor  

    Alcantra + PCA + Palencia + Triantos + Wicks for Cease + Robert + Moncada

    As everyone has stated before, the problem is that Hoyer doesn't want to spend the money or give the years to sign a star and he doesn't want to trade the prospects necessary to make a big trade.

     

    Rcal10

    Posted

    I am fine with the Cubs not getting Bellinger. But is they don’t they have to make a trade for a solid left handed bat. There are none in free agency. Basically they would need to make a trade for Naylor. And then they would need another bat. So either Hoskins or Chapman as a free agent or trade for Alonso. If the Cubs feel Morel can handle third base Hoskins would be my choice. If not, sign Chapman and let Morel DH, or make, yet, another trade for someone like Torres, Lowe or Polanco and let them play 3rd and Morel DH.  If they were able to get Naylor and Bieber without using PCA, which they should be able to do, at least they would have a decent line up. Add another staring pitcher via free agency and a pen arm and you have a solid high 80’s to low 90’s win team. They have enough in the system to make any of those deals. And they would still have a decent system. Guys like Bieber, Alonso, Polanco, and even Torres shouldnt be too expensive because this is the last year of their contracts. If they don’t want to block prospects and Morel can’t handle third, maybe a trade is bettter than Chapman. 

    LBiittner

    Posted

    57 minutes ago, Rcal10 said:

    I am fine with the Cubs not getting Bellinger. But is they don’t they have to make a trade for a solid left handed bat. There are none in free agency. Basically they would need to make a trade for Naylor. And then they would need another bat. So either Hoskins or Chapman as a free agent or trade for Alonso. If the Cubs feel Morel can handle third base Hoskins would be my choice. If not, sign Chapman and let Morel DH, or make, yet, another trade for someone like Torres, Lowe or Polanco and let them play 3rd and Morel DH.  If they were able to get Naylor and Bieber without using PCA, which they should be able to do, at least they would have a decent line up. Add another staring pitcher via free agency and a pen arm and you have a solid high 80’s to low 90’s win team. They have enough in the system to make any of those deals. And they would still have a decent system. Guys like Bieber, Alonso, Polanco, and even Torres shouldnt be too expensive because this is the last year of their contracts. If they don’t want to block prospects and Morel can’t handle third, maybe a trade is bettter than Chapman. 

    If these players are going to be had for a song and dance, why aren't other teams knocking down the door to snatch them up?




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...