Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Cubs News & Analysis

    A Trade a Day: Ok, Let's Talk About Jeimer Candelario


    Matthew Trueblood

    In finishing a must-win homestand 6-4, the Cubs gained little clarity about next week's MLB trade deadline. That they avoided becoming outright sellers constitutes that win they needed, though, and it gives us cause to talk about what acquiring a valuable rental bat would look like.

    Image courtesy of © Matt Marton-USA TODAY Sports

    Cubs Video

    Cody Bellinger hit so well over the last week and a half that he has simultaneously cemented himself as the best impending free-agent hitter who could be traded at this deadline, and decreased the likelihood that he actually will be. If we nix Bellinger (at least for the purposes of this discussion) as a trade candidate, then the guy who emerges as the top rental bat on the market is former Cub (and especially Cubs prospect) Jeimer Candelario.

    Non-tendered by the Tigers after a miserable 2022, Candelario has regained the form he showed in 2021 this year with the Nationals. The Cubs saw just how dangerous he can be last week. He only collected three hits in 14 plate appearances during Washington's stop at Wrigley Field, but two of them left the park. On the year, he's hitting .254/.333/.474, with 27 doubles, two triples, and 15 home runs. In over 800 plate appearances in 2020-21, he batted .278/.356/.458, so this isn't a new level for him. It's just a return to what he's demonstrated the ability to do in the past.

    Candelario's defense is always a bit of a Rorschach test. He gives you things to like and things to dislike, and even defensive metrics tend to give mixed or contradictory reports on him. In that way, he's not dissimilar from the Cubs' incumbents at the hot corner, Nick Madrigal, Patrick Wisdom, and Christopher Morel. By and large, though, he's looked better this year than in the last two, and he wouldn't in any way compromise the defensive phalanx the Cubs have strived to create.

    Nor is it hard to see how Candelario would fit into the lineup. He's been consistently better as a left-handed batter, against right-handed pitchers, but he's not bootless against lefties, either. The batting orders in the wake of a trade for Candelario could shake out something like this:

      vs. RHP vs. LHP
    1 Tauchman - DH Hoerner - 2B
    2 Happ - LF Suzuki - RF
    3 Candelario - 3B Candelario - 3B
    4 Bellinger - CF Swanson - SS
    5 Suzuki - RF Bellinger - CF
    6 Swanson - SS Happ - LF
    7 Mervis - 1B Gomes - C
    8 Gomes - C Wisdom - DH
    9 Hoerner - 2B Mancini - 1B

    The improvement in each of those, relative to the team's current options, is obvious and immense. Candelario isn't the transformational masher Cubs fans would most love to see the team find somewhere, but he's a superb lengthener of a lineup like this one. He'd give the Cubs the occasional home run, but also fit well into their perpetual plan to draw walks, hit doubles, and apply pressure by stringing together hits.

    Of course, even after that encouraging weekend against the lowly Cardinals, it feels a bit odd to talk about the team landing a player who would be a true rental. Candelario will hit free agency after this season, and the Cubs would probably have to give the Nationals something commensurate with the value of a compensatory draft pick, because (like Bellinger) he's played his way from being cut by one team to being worthy of a qualifying offer from another one in less than a year. That's just to enter the bidding; the final price would have to beat the offers likely to come in from a handful of other contenders in need of an offensive boost.

    Part of the price for Candelario could be one of the third basemen the Cubs have already used this year: Wisdom, Madrigal, or Morel. If it were the latter, surely, that would be all Chicago would be willing to give up, and even it would feel awfully rich. Morel's lack of a clear defensive home and his streakiness during long exchanges of adjustment with MLB pitchers make him risky to keep, but his power, speed, and overall upside make him risky to trade, especially for a short-term asset. He has five years of team control left after 2023, and won't reach arbitration eligibility until 2026 because of the Cubs' choice to keep him in Iowa for almost six weeks to start this year.

    Wisdom, believe it or not, has some trade value, because he'll still have three years of team control (albeit as an over-30, arbitration-eligible slugger whose homers might inflate his earning power past his usefulness) left when this season ends. So might Madrigal, despite his ups and downs and even despite his relentless battles with injuries. Neither could carry a trade for Candelario on their own, though.

    The Cubs do have a laundry list of players who make sense in a deal like this one, though. This winter, they face tough decisions about whether to add several players to their 40-man roster, or expose them to the Rule 5 Draft. These include Triple-A hitters Jake Slaughter, Luis Vazquez, and Yonathan Perlaza, and Double-A arms DJ Herz, Kohl Franklin, Richard Gallardo, Carlos Guzman, Porter Hodge, and Luke Little.

    The Nationals would have to add any of those guys (or Michael Arias, whom I mentioned in yesterday's post about trading with the woebegone Royals for starter Brady Singer) to their roster this winter, too, of course, but they have much more deadweight and space on their projected roster to fit them. The Cubs could pair one of their controllable big-league pieces with one of those guys to put together a competitive offer, or go a step further and include B.J. Murray--a kind of mini-Candelario, who seems to be passing the Double-A test with flying colors in his second full pro season and who looks like an imminently useful big-league hitter. Murray doesn't need to be added to the 40-man until after next season, and would be an appealing trade chip for a Washington team trying to assemble a more competitive roster in the medium term.

    That Candelario is only a short-term addition will hold his price down, even as teams vie for the right to land him. The Cubs wouldn't need to part with any of their top-tier talent to get him. Giving up Morel would really sting, but a package of Wisdom, Hodge, and Murray has some chance of getting the deal done. Again, it's bizarre to talk about trading for a rental player while trade rumors still swirl around Stroman, Bellinger, and others, but the Cubs earned themselves and their fans the right to think about it for (at least) a couple more days. 

    Follow North Side Baseball For Chicago Cubs News & Analysis

    Recent Cubs Articles

    Recent Cubs Videos


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    chopsx9

    Posted

    Nay on Candalerio...short of suddenly being in serious contention and even then...maybe...I guess.

    Morel has shown some offensive progression - stick him at a position for 50 games and lets see if we see some defensive progression.  I wonder if the reason he's not playing 3B now is that the Cubs don't think he's viable at all at 3B.  I mean there isn't a scenario where he ends up at 2b I don't think.

    Also lots of chatter in the Toronto media about Bellinger today.  Lots of talk of benching Varsho and his sub 180 OBP over the last 30 days.  He's been a black hole offensively all season - basically an Owar of 0 and Toronto feels they need more offense.  The questioning of the that trade has bubbled up periodically all season but lots of hate on it currently.  Even a mention of sending him down and giving it a try again next year.

    • Like 1
    Tim

    Posted

    48 minutes ago, chopsx9 said:

    Yeah I'd be making every attempt in the world to push the theory of the rejuvenating ivy of Wrigley Field and sign him to a big deal. 

    Would you sign him to a Nimmo-size deal?

    The statcast numbers freak me out when thinking about making a long-term commitment. I think I'd opt on the sell-high side of things if the offer is out there.

    chibears55

    Posted

    i think I'd rather see what Jake Slaughter can do for 2 months then spend assets on a rental.

    chopsx9

    Posted

    51 minutes ago, Tim said:

    Would you sign him to a Nimmo-size deal?

    The statcast numbers freak me out when thinking about making a long-term commitment. I think I'd opt on the sell-high side of things if the offer is out there.

    I would - I'd be all in - we can't possibly "Heyward" twice...right?  He's 28 - can reasonably expect to still be producing at a high level through the next window.  You don't have to give up any prospects.  Who can the Cubs reasonably expect to get that's going to be better than him?  He'd be the cornerstone to build around.

    chibears55

    Posted

    12 minutes ago, chopsx9 said:

    I would - I'd be all in - we can't possibly "Heyward" twice...right?  He's 28 - can reasonably expect to still be producing at a high level through the next window.  You don't have to give up any prospects.  Who can the Cubs reasonably expect to get that's going to be better than him?  He'd be the cornerstone to build around.

    Agree, id rather trade Suzuki and move Bellinger to RF

    • Like 1
    CubUgly

    Posted

    15 hours ago, Matt Trueblood said:

    Mastro, Mancini, and Wisdom in right! Yes, they’ve done some wild horsefeathers that way. The difference is that I think they felt they had no choice in those situations, but they *are* fairly comfortable with Wisdom, Mastro, and Madrigal as defensive 3B even while still trying to contend. Again, I’m with you. I just see a distinction they might be drawing there, between being cornered and proactively choosing a risky alignment. 

    Ironically, Madrigal has been the best of them all defensively at third, no one could have predicted that.  He worked his tail off and made himself a servicable 3rd basemen in a relatively short amount of time.   Of course he lacks the power you would like at that corner and only in the last few weeks before he got  hurt did he start hitting anywhere near the player we thought we would be getting.

    And therein lies the rub, how much are you willing to risk defensively to get the hitting and power you want and need at 3rd?  I agree the risk is there defensively more with Morel than the others - but honestly none are really great there.  

    Tryptamine

    Posted

    I don't know we've ever seen a 3B with as little power as Madrigal, but very limited power 3B aren't entirely unprecedented. I can kind of see Madrigal being a budget Placido Polanco. 

    CubinNY

    Posted

    1 hour ago, Tryptamine said:

    I don't know we've ever seen a 3B with as little power as Madrigal, but very limited power 3B aren't entirely unprecedented. I can kind of see Madrigal being a budget Placido Polanco. 

    He can't stay healthy. I think that's his number 1 problem. He has no value on the DL

    CubUgly

    Posted

    3 hours ago, Tryptamine said:

    I don't know we've ever seen a 3B with as little power as Madrigal, but very limited power 3B aren't entirely unprecedented. I can kind of see Madrigal being a budget Placido Polanco. 

    I know BA is an outdated stat that few give credence to anymore, but for someone who rarely walks or hits for power like Madrigal, it's important.  He almost has to hit .300 or more to justify playing him anywhere.

    Tryptamine

    Posted

    12 minutes ago, CubUgly said:

    I know BA is an outdated stat that few give credence to anymore, but for someone who rarely walks or hits for power like Madrigal, it's important.  He almost has to hit .300 or more to justify playing him anywhere.

    Even with his horrendous start to the year and his modest .278/.335/.364 line so far he has put up .7 fWAR in 53 games. That's 2.13fWAR per 162 which isn't awful. If he's a .300 hitter he's more like a 3 fWAR guy. The biggest issue is will he ever get anywhere near 100 MLB games, let alone 162 to build up that value. 

    chibears55

    Posted

    6 hours ago, CubUgly said:

    I know BA is an outdated stat that few give credence to anymore, but for someone who rarely walks or hits for power like Madrigal, it's important.  He almost has to hit .300 or more to justify playing him anywhere.

    Right, he needs to have a high OBP and that starts with his batting average because he doesn't walk much.. he just not a guy you want on a contending team, he useful for a team rebuilding or going through the motion of putting a team together. 

     

    • Like 1
    KCCub

    Posted


     




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...