Jump to content
North Side Baseball
Posted

With Peavy injured, I am seriously contemplating trading David Wright but please only serious offers...

 

I am looking for a top 5 pitcher; otherwise, a top 10 pitcher and a top 20 OF

Recommended Posts

Posted
With Peavy injured, I am seriously contemplating trading David Wright but please only serious offers...

 

I am looking for a top 5 pitcher; otherwise, a top 10 pitcher and a top 20 OF

 

Seriously?

Posted

That does seem a bit much for David Wright. He's not even in the same league as Nate McLouth and I wouldn't even ask that much???

 

 

MM

Posted
That does seem a bit much for David Wright. He's not even in the same league as Nate McLouth and I wouldn't even ask that much???

 

 

MM

 

Really????

 

I bet if I offer you Wright for McLouth straight up you would take it in a heartbeat...McLouth has only been doing what he has done only two months and Wright has been doing it for the last two years.

 

I guess Wright is worth more to me on my roster at this point...

Posted
Roady, what did you think of my PM?

 

Having Wright is more valuable to my team than the offer you made...

 

But it's what you were asking for. :scratch:

Posted
Roady, what did you think of my PM?

 

Having Wright is more valuable to my team than the offer you made...

 

But it's what you were asking for. :scratch:

 

I don't consider the pitcher you offered a top 5 pitcher....

Posted
I don't consider the pitcher you offered a top 5 pitcher....

 

You can't argue with top 5 numbers. I would be surprised if you're offered better.

Posted
I don't consider the pitcher you offered a top 5 pitcher....

 

You can't argue with top 5 numbers. I would be surprised if you're offered better.

 

Actually, I have not gotten any sniffs, so I guess I am overvaluing Wright but by year's end he will be a top position player so I will not give him away and still stand by my request for a top player or players.

 

The pitcher you offered has only done it recently so I don't consider it top 5 performance.

Posted
I don't consider the pitcher you offered a top 5 pitcher....

 

You can't argue with top 5 numbers. I would be surprised if you're offered better.

 

Actually, I have not gotten any sniffs, so I guess I am overvaluing Wright but by year's end he will be a top position player so I will not give him away and still stand by my request for a top player or players.

 

The pitcher you offered has only done it recently so I don't consider it top 5 performance.

 

So you think Wright is worth more than the 6th top pitcher- Lee (and you'd be right) but turned down a top 8 RF PLUS an exempt pitcher and a Top 100 minor leaguer for the 29th top pitcher to this point?

 

Sounds pretty inconsistent to me.

Posted
I don't consider the pitcher you offered a top 5 pitcher....

 

You can't argue with top 5 numbers. I would be surprised if you're offered better.

 

Actually, I have not gotten any sniffs, so I guess I am overvaluing Wright but by year's end he will be a top position player so I will not give him away and still stand by my request for a top player or players.

 

The pitcher you offered has only done it recently so I don't consider it top 5 performance.

 

So you think Wright is worth more than the 6th top pitcher- Lee (and you'd be right) but turned down a top 8 RF PLUS an exempt pitcher and a Top 100 minor leaguer for the 29th top pitcher to this point?

 

Sounds pretty inconsistent to me.

 

You may have to remind me about that particular trade because it does not right a bell...if your numbers are correct then it would be a bad rejection. If you are talking about your last offer for Haren, then I would disagree because Haren is better than a 29th top pitcher...Hawpe is a nice player but not a top 8 RF (I should know, I had Hawpe last year and traded him because of his inconsistencies) and the exempt pitcher you offered was not any better than what I had (exempt or non exempt) and there was no Top 100 minor leaguer in the offer

Posted
I don't consider the pitcher you offered a top 5 pitcher....

 

You can't argue with top 5 numbers. I would be surprised if you're offered better.

 

Actually, I have not gotten any sniffs, so I guess I am overvaluing Wright but by year's end he will be a top position player so I will not give him away and still stand by my request for a top player or players.

 

The pitcher you offered has only done it recently so I don't consider it top 5 performance.

 

So you think Wright is worth more than the 6th top pitcher- Lee (and you'd be right) but turned down a top 8 RF PLUS an exempt pitcher and a Top 100 minor leaguer for the 29th top pitcher to this point?

 

Sounds pretty inconsistent to me.

 

You may have to remind me about that particular trade because it does not right a bell...if your numbers are correct then it would be a bad rejection. If you are talking about your last offer for Haren, then I would disagree because Haren is better than a 29th top pitcher...Hawpe is a nice player but not a top 8 RF (I should know, I had Hawpe last year and traded him because of his inconsistencies) and the exempt pitcher you offered was not any better than what I had (exempt or non exempt) and there was no Top 100 minor leaguer in the offer

 

Hawpe WAS the 8th best RF last year. Look it up. (And you say "I should know, I traded him because he was inconsistent. Dude, you traded him to me on April 9th.) Litsch is nothing special, you're right, but Lowrie is a BA Top 100 prospect, and played 3 positions while up earlier this year.

 

You can check for yourself, but everything I've posted is accurate.

Posted
I don't consider the pitcher you offered a top 5 pitcher....

 

You can't argue with top 5 numbers. I would be surprised if you're offered better.

 

Actually, I have not gotten any sniffs, so I guess I am overvaluing Wright but by year's end he will be a top position player so I will not give him away and still stand by my request for a top player or players.

 

The pitcher you offered has only done it recently so I don't consider it top 5 performance.

 

So you think Wright is worth more than the 6th top pitcher- Lee (and you'd be right) but turned down a top 8 RF PLUS an exempt pitcher and a Top 100 minor leaguer for the 29th top pitcher to this point?

 

Sounds pretty inconsistent to me.

 

You may have to remind me about that particular trade because it does not right a bell...if your numbers are correct then it would be a bad rejection. If you are talking about your last offer for Haren, then I would disagree because Haren is better than a 29th top pitcher...Hawpe is a nice player but not a top 8 RF (I should know, I had Hawpe last year and traded him because of his inconsistencies) and the exempt pitcher you offered was not any better than what I had (exempt or non exempt) and there was no Top 100 minor leaguer in the offer

 

Hawpe WAS the 8th best RF last year. Look it up. (And you say "I should know, I traded him because he was inconsistent. Dude, you traded him to me on April 9th.) Litsch is nothing special, you're right, but Lowrie is a BA Top 100 prospect, and played 3 positions while up earlier this year.

 

You can check for yourself, but everything I've posted is accurate.

 

I traded Hawpe last year, not this year. He was on my roster for 2006 so I know how he performed that's why I traded him. I don't think Lowrie was included in the trade. If I recall the offer was Hawpe and Litsch. If Lowrie was included, he is ok but I have enough minor leaguers that are ok so another one would not matter.

 

If accurate you mean the numbers, those don't matter to me. I make my own judgement on who is top players at their position so Hawpe to me is not a top player in his position.

Posted

Roady over-values his players way too much. In the end, I guess that is why his team never makes the playoffs.

 

Let's play a game called name that player.

 

Out of McLouth and Wright, can you "name that player" ~

 

Is this Wright or McLouth's weekly points?? 23/22/41/9/21/15/29/6

 

Is this Wright or McLouth's weekly points?? 35/27/27/26/28/20/33/10

 

Roady, if you want me to beat you by 100 points again, just say the word.

 

MM 2007 & soon-to-be 2008 Champion

Posted
Roady over-values his players way too much. In the end, I guess that is why his team never makes the playoffs.

 

 

Um, Roady made the playoffs last season. #-o

Posted
Roady over-values his players way too much. In the end, I guess that is why his team never makes the playoffs.

 

Let's play a game called name that player.

 

Out of McLouth and Wright, can you "name that player" ~

 

Is this Wright or McLouth's weekly points?? 23/22/41/9/21/15/29/6

 

Is this Wright or McLouth's weekly points?? 35/27/27/26/28/20/33/10

 

Roady, if you want me to beat you by 100 points again, just say the word.

 

MM 2007 & soon-to-be 2008 Champion

 

MM, you better check your history...I won in 2006 and I lost to you in the semifinals last year...so please before you say non sense check your facts...

 

I am not the only GM who over values its own players...every GM (real or fantasy) over values their players.

 

99% out of 100, if I offer anyone Wright for McLouth, it will be accepted because Wright is a better player (real or fantasy) than McLouth.

Posted
Roady over-values his players way too much. In the end, I guess that is why his team never makes the playoffs.

 

 

Um, Roady made the playoffs last season. #-o

 

Mooch should know because I beat him out by some weird tie-breaker...we both ended up with the same record.

Posted

Mooch should know because I beat him out by some weird tie-breaker...we both ended up with the same record.

 

:club:

 

Gotta make sure that doesn't happen again.

Posted

My apologies....our match up was not memorable enough for me to remember.

 

I will take you out again if you make the playoffs ~ write it down!!

 

MM

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...