Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Replies 107
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
From the link that cubbiechris provided. The latest:

 

http://images.bleedcubbieblue.com/images/admin/wrigley102507b.jpg

 

That's cool that they're leveling it out rather than dropping it down.

Posted
how much can you really do over the winter though? the ground freezes, thus making any sort of work difficult.

 

 

only a few inches of ground really freezes. they should be able to work.

Depends on how "hard" the winter is. However, when I was in college and working for a landscaper he had us bury the water pipes 18 inches. I think the frost line is 12 inches, but I could be wrong.

 

It was 30 inches in Denver but that is not necessarily how deep the ground freezes in a normal winter.

Posted
This story is fascinating. They found the Bears' old goal post anchors.

 

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/cs-071025cubs,0,1633400.story?coll=chi_tab02_layout

 

So what will the Cubs do with these long-lost chunks of Bears history?

 

"They told me to toss them out," Bossard said.

It really is. For a brief period of time during my undergrad days I thought about going into landscape engineering, but unless you have deep pockets to begin with it's real hard to make any money.
Posted
Anyone think Pie is going to have a tough time adjusting to that hill in CF?

I think it will be more difficult for the 2b and SS since they'll be running back into it... at least the CF will be able to run up into it. I say they leave it... and put a flag pole in the middle of it and a moat around it... WITH some sort of dragon or something.

 

Also... since they are lowering the infield, they'll have to remove the pitchers mound/home plate anyways... are the tarps so that they have a landmark or what?

Posted
Just saw a nice feature on Chicago Comcast Sports Net. It was all about the Cubs hiring this "field guru" of sorts from the White Sox, to re-do Wrigley. This person-- and for the life of me, I can't remember his name BUT this dude is supposed to be the best in the business. Gail Fischer said something like this guy has worked on something like the last 4 of 6 World Series champions...so are the Cubs next?
Posted
Also... since they are lowering the infield, they'll have to remove the pitchers mound/home plate anyways... are the tarps so that they have a landmark or what?

 

I don't think they are lowering it, just leveling it out. The story said that they are removing 14 inches of material, installing a drainage system, then adding 14 inches of material.

Posted
Also... since they are lowering the infield, they'll have to remove the pitchers mound/home plate anyways... are the tarps so that they have a landmark or what?

 

I don't think they are lowering it, just leveling it out. The story said that they are removing 14 inches of material, installing a drainage system, then adding 14 inches of material.

 

 

yea, but where does it drain to? Have you thought about that?

Posted
Also... since they are lowering the infield, they'll have to remove the pitchers mound/home plate anyways... are the tarps so that they have a landmark or what?

 

I don't think they are lowering it, just leveling it out. The story said that they are removing 14 inches of material, installing a drainage system, then adding 14 inches of material.

 

 

yea, but where does it drain to? Have you thought about that?

 

Into a 60,000 gallon reservoir and into the municipal system.

Posted
Is anyone else dismayed that they just threw away the sod and the goalpost anchors? It would have been real cool if someone preserved that.
Posted
Is anyone else dismayed that they just threw away the sod and the goalpost anchors? It would have been real cool if someone preserved that.

 

It's just grass and cement blocks. Who cares.

Posted
Is anyone else dismayed that they just threw away the sod and the goalpost anchors? It would have been real cool if someone preserved that.

 

I'm only a little suprised they didn't try to sell it....I think it would have been cool to buy some wrigley grass for my yard.

Posted
Is anyone else dismayed that they just threw away the sod and the goalpost anchors? It would have been real cool if someone preserved that.

 

It's just grass and cement blocks. Who cares.

 

 

When they replaced theoutfield a few weeks ago, I grabbed a bunch and planted it, so I know where youre coming from. But a goal post anchor is literally just a big ole block of cement.

Posted
Also... since they are lowering the infield, they'll have to remove the pitchers mound/home plate anyways... are the tarps so that they have a landmark or what?

 

I don't think they are lowering it, just leveling it out. The story said that they are removing 14 inches of material, installing a drainage system, then adding 14 inches of material.

 

 

yea, but where does it drain to? Have you thought about that?

 

Into a 60,000 gallon reservoir and into the municipal system.

They should use the reservoir to water the grass. I imagine it will be mostly empty most of the time though. It's kind of like having a dry well drainage system.
Posted
Is anyone else dismayed that they just threw away the sod and the goalpost anchors? It would have been real cool if someone preserved that.

 

It's just grass and cement blocks. Who cares.

 

I think a lot of people would have wanted some Wrigley grass. Additionally, the goal post anchors: who knows if someone wanted them or not? Perhaps it would have been possible to reuse them. You can always throw it away, but if you throw it away, you can't put it to good use. They should have at least seen if someone had any interest or ideas of what to do with them.

Posted
Is anyone else dismayed that they just threw away the sod and the goalpost anchors? It would have been real cool if someone preserved that.

 

It's just grass and cement blocks. Who cares.

 

I think a lot of people would have wanted some Wrigley grass. Additionally, the goal post anchors: who knows if someone wanted them or not? Perhaps it would have been possible to reuse them. You can always throw it away, but if you throw it away, you can't put it to good use. They should have at least seen if someone had any interest or ideas of what to do with them.

 

I don't understand why someone would want 90-year-old concrete.

Posted
Is anyone else dismayed that they just threw away the sod and the goalpost anchors? It would have been real cool if someone preserved that.

 

It's just grass and cement blocks. Who cares.

 

I think a lot of people would have wanted some Wrigley grass. Additionally, the goal post anchors: who knows if someone wanted them or not? Perhaps it would have been possible to reuse them. You can always throw it away, but if you throw it away, you can't put it to good use. They should have at least seen if someone had any interest or ideas of what to do with them.

 

I don't understand why someone would want 90-year-old concrete.

You don't think someone out there would pay decent money for the goal post anchors with 50 years of Bears history?

Posted
Is anyone else dismayed that they just threw away the sod and the goalpost anchors? It would have been real cool if someone preserved that.

 

It's just grass and cement blocks. Who cares.

 

I think a lot of people would have wanted some Wrigley grass. Additionally, the goal post anchors: who knows if someone wanted them or not? Perhaps it would have been possible to reuse them. You can always throw it away, but if you throw it away, you can't put it to good use. They should have at least seen if someone had any interest or ideas of what to do with them.

 

I don't understand why someone would want 90-year-old concrete.

You don't think someone out there would pay decent money for the goal post anchors with 50 years of Bears history?

 

I understand that there's a lot of history there, but it's not like they found the actual goal posts. It's just the concrete anchors to the goal posts.

Posted
Is anyone else dismayed that they just threw away the sod and the goalpost anchors? It would have been real cool if someone preserved that.

 

It's just grass and cement blocks. Who cares.

 

I think a lot of people would have wanted some Wrigley grass. Additionally, the goal post anchors: who knows if someone wanted them or not? Perhaps it would have been possible to reuse them. You can always throw it away, but if you throw it away, you can't put it to good use. They should have at least seen if someone had any interest or ideas of what to do with them.

 

I don't understand why someone would want 90-year-old concrete.

You don't think someone out there would pay decent money for the goal post anchors with 50 years of Bears history?

 

Seriously. It doesn't even matter if anyone pays for them. Heck, drop them in the park next to Soldier Field, stick a plaque on it, and voila! public history/memorial/art. That's a lot better than sitting in a trash heap.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund
The North Side Baseball Caretaker Fund

You all care about this site. The next step is caring for it. We’re asking you to caretake this site so it can remain the premier Cubs community on the internet. Included with caretaking is ad-free browsing of North Side Baseball.

×
×
  • Create New...