Jump to content
North Side Baseball
  • Cubs Rumors & Notes

    Cubs Video

    The duo over at The Athletic has been plugged into the Cubs thinking this winter.  This morning, they provide a little clarity on the teams' pursuit of starting pitching, as well as some timing:

    Quote

    Adding one more credible option to the rotation mix is likely for the Cubs. If that goal is accomplished in the next few weeks, it would likely have occurred via trade. But if that addition comes through free agency, the Cubs would probably wait out this current rush to sign starting pitchers, which has led to skyrocketing price tags.

    The wait on the Juan Soto sweepstakes and how that impacts the Cody Bellinger market is mentioned as a factor in the Cubs' decision making.  Presumably that could cut both ways, either allowing directly for a SP to be brought in as part of a Bellinger trade, or freeing up money to pursue a wider range of free agents.

    Walker Buehler is name checked as a potential target.  Though that middle class of free agent starters is moving quickly, so he may be gone by the time any requisite trade dominos fall.

    Follow North Side Baseball For Chicago Cubs News & Analysis

    How many games will the Chicago Cubs win in 2026?

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Bertz

    Posted

    Big fan of adding Luzardo.  This is the sort of risk you can take when you've got the pitching depth the Cubs do.

    • Like 1
    Transmogrified Tiger

    Posted

    Feel like 4 LHSP is where I start getting more legitimately antsy about negative network effects, but Luzardo is tempting.  Just have to add Roki as #6 to make sure there's balance I guess.

    • Like 1
    UMFan83

    Posted

    36 minutes ago, Dfan25 said:

    Nightendale says they are showing interest in Jesús Luzardo 

    Jesse Rogers was on ESPN 1000 and said he’d heard something similar when told about Boob’s report. 

    Jason Ross

    Posted

    I'm so iffy on Luzardo. There's a guy there when he's healthy. He also offers a different skillset. 

    With that said, he's an amazingly risky piece of business. He was flat not very good in 2024. He was hurt, sure, but he's had injuries in his history. He got hit pretty well and lost velocity on the fastball from 2023. He didn't have a single pitch over 100 on stuff+ last year. 

    The price couldn't be particularly high as you're taking a decent amount of risk on. As well, you'd have to have a solution for his problems. 

    JBears79

    Posted

    49 minutes ago, Dfan25 said:

    Nightendale says they are showing interest in Jesús Luzardo 

    Would be awesome. Big fan of his

    SOFNR

    Posted

    14 minutes ago, Bertz said:

    Big fan of adding Luzardo.  This is the sort of risk you can take when you've got the pitching depth the Cubs do.

    Are you at all worried about his 2024? He hasn't pitched since June. He suffered an elbow injury. His K/9 dipped quite a bit. His velocity dipped. Then a back injury that kept him out from June 16th till the end of the year. I'd love 2022-2023 Luzardo but I'd be worried about giving up anything significant for him at this point. Plus pairing him with Boyd, who hasn't pitched more then 80 innings in 5 years, seems a good way to run through that depth fast. If you take the risk on Luzardo, who only costs 6 mil, you might want to grab another high ceiling bounce back guy to throw in there too.

    JBears79

    Posted

    7 minutes ago, TomtheBombadil said:

    They’re a Gilbert/Kirby and Sasaki away from being worth checking out in the early season 

    We need another bullpen anchor too imo. Im a Porter Hodge believer but i want some competition for him

    Bertz

    Posted

    13 minutes ago, SOFNR said:

    Are you at all worried about his 2024? He hasn't pitched since June. He suffered an elbow injury. His K/9 dipped quite a bit. His velocity dipped. Then a back injury that kept him out from June 16th till the end of the year. I'd love 2022-2023 Luzardo but I'd be worried about giving up anything significant for him at this point. Plus pairing him with Boyd, who hasn't pitched more then 80 innings in 5 years, seems a good way to run through that depth fast. If you take the risk on Luzardo, who only costs 6 mil, you might want to grab another high ceiling bounce back guy to throw in there too.

    Through May 11th his fastball was 96.5, right in line with the two years prior.  Things dipped from there and about a month later his season ended.

    I feel pretty confident blaming his poor performance last year on injury.  He obviously doesn't have to bounce back, but a year ago at this time he was considered a bonafide star.  We are the exact type of team that should be buying low and making these sorts of gambles.  There's a good chance he's still a star.  And if he's still damaged goods?  Oh well I guess the path to innings for Ben Brown and Cade Horton got less complicated.

    • Like 1
    Bertz

    Posted

    I wonder if the Nats would make MacKenzie Gore available.  I feel like at the start of the offseason there was some talk about them pulling a Jayson Werth 2.0 type of move, but it's been all crickets and the current Fangraphs projections do not think the team is at all close to competing.  Currently projected as the 3rd worst team in the league.

    You'd get three more years of Gore and this is his first year of arb at a projected $3.5M, so even if you sent them a little more prospect capital than you're comfortable with that's not exactly a sell out for '25 move.

    Illiterate Scholar

    Posted

    Kaplan also mentioned the Cubs' interest in Luzardo on his podcast. Seems like there's smoke. 

    WhyCantWeWin

    Posted

    I doubt Luzardo would cost any of the Cubs prospects on the top 100

    Cuzi

    Posted

    Luzardo feels more like a deadline move to me. There's nothing for the Marlins to lose by waiting unless you give them something compelling.

    Transmogrified Tiger

    Posted

    2 minutes ago, Cuzi said:

    Luzardo feels more like a deadline move to me. There's nothing for the Marlins to lose by waiting unless you give them something compelling.

    Maybe, but if they think he's cooked or the risk of further injury is high enough, it becomes a net negative to wait.

    Cuzi

    Posted (edited)

    5 minutes ago, Transmogrified Tiger said:

    Maybe, but if they think he's cooked or the risk of further injury is high enough, it becomes a net negative to wait.

    I mean, what exactly are you thinking the offers are going to be on a pitcher who had a throw away season because of arms issues and back issues? He's only got 2 years of control left, so it's just as likely he pitches 10 innings for you and never sees the field again in your teams colors.

    Edited by Cuzi
    Transmogrified Tiger

    Posted

    6 minutes ago, Cuzi said:

    I mean, what exactly are you thinking the offers are going to be on a pitcher who had a throw away season because of arms issues and back issues? He's only got 2 years of control left, so it's just as likely he pitches 10 innings for you and never sees the field again in your teams colors.

    Yes, that's why they might trade him now instead of the deadline?  We agree?

    Cuzi

    Posted

    Just now, Transmogrified Tiger said:

    Yes, that's why they might trade him now instead of the deadline?  We agree?

    Not if the offer is fodder, like I said. It would only make sense if the offer is compelling and nothing has been reported beyond preliminary discussions. There's a dude out there on twitter suggesting they are looking for a top catcher or SS prospect. Pass.

    We Got The Whole 9

    Posted (edited)

    I'd trade Aliendo. Ramirez, and Gray for him

    Edited by We Got The Whole 9
    Bertz

    Posted

    Cubs probably shouldn't be in on another low velo lefty, but curious to see what the damage is here prospect wise. 

    ToolDRT

    Posted

    🤮 

    • Like 1
    Bertz

    Posted

    1 minute ago, 1908_Cubs said:

     

    LFG!

    Also this feels definitive enough I should probably write it up

    Wilson A2000

    Posted

    2 minutes ago, 1908_Cubs said:

     

    That would be a terrible trade

    • Like 1
    Eeyore

    Posted

    What is Chuy's contact situation?

    WhyCantWeWin

    Posted

    4 minutes ago, 1908_Cubs said:

     

    Now thats an overpay

    • Like 1



    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...