Calling them our three "top" pitching prospects is the same as calling Roberts an "all star." It's all contextual and doesnt' really matter. What matters is how they grade out as prospects. They're only "top" prospects because they're in our system. In reality, none of them are A prospects. Yeah, but it's all we really have, in terms of prospects potentially able to step in relatively soon OR prospects that are going to hae some trade value. Trading them now on a good player who is arguably very redundant and doesn't address the teams major holes could very easily leave the team damn near crippled if the precarious starting pitching balance falls apart AND if they need to make key trades by the deadline. I think the concept that this leaves the cupboard bare is a bit overblown. The Cubs one advantage over most teams remains money. And with money, it is quite possible, and rather easy, to restock a farm quickly. I'm not worried about restocking the farm system. I don't think any of those prospects are particuarly that good (Gallagher is pretty good, but I think a bit overrated on this board). But they are all close to the majors, and when Dempster inevitably sucks, and Lieber goes down, we're not going to have a lot of SP depth. And that's pretty much the biggest reason why I don't want to see Gallagher traded for a 2B when we already have a pretty good one.