Nah, I agree. The 2nd and 3rd weren't pretty, but he didn't allow any more runs and still ended up striking out 5. He kept the team in the game for the next two innings. I like Hill, but when a starter only goes three innings, there's nothing positive about that. I'm not going to go off on a Rich Hill sucks tangent, because that's ridiculous, nor will I question his desire or any overreaction like that. But, to try to put any positive spin on his start today is pretty silly. He was bad. Did he confine the damage to one inning? Yes. But he still pitched so poorly that he left trailing by a huge amount and forced the bullpen to be perfect. Had he given up five and then held the Brewers scoreless into the fifth or sixth, then more props could be given. But he got lit up, had another bad inning, and had to be lifted after only three innings. In no metric, no book, no where is that a good outing. Will he rebound? I surely hope so. But just because many of us like Hill, I think it's a bit ludicrous to try to say anything positive about this start. If Marquis lasted three innings while allowing five runs, I doubt anyone here would try to give him credit for throwing two scoreless innings after giving up five in the first. The simple truth: Hill sucked today. It happens to a lot of pitchers. Hopefully, Hill gets his act together over the next four days. I know he can do it, but he definitely wasn't a good pitcher today. Well put. Right, and I agree with Vance...this was a bad outing. But I don't see the harm in looking for any kind of upside considering the expectations we have for Hill. It's not like I'm trying to explain away how bad he was. But would you be looking for the same upside in a Marquis start? Did he really pitch that well for two innings? Are we really surprised that a pitcher held a team scoreless for two innings? Like I said, had he lasted into the fifth, then I'd be far more willing to give him props for getting his act together. But looking beyond the box score, he threw way too many pitches in two innings and therefore doomed himself to a short outing. He got lit in the first and then was far from perfect in the second. He flirted with disaster then too. It was a bad start. His ERA for the game was 15.00 or something like that. Hill is a better pitcher than that. But trying to find anything positive is akin to having a student miss every question on a multiple choice test, yet say well at least he spelled his name correctly and wow he makes a pretty "a" even if it's incorrect.