vance_the_cubs_fan

And Hart leads off the game with a double...damnit!

It looks like even Zambrano thinks we should vote for Young. Link.

And yet Sullivan, who should know better, runs with the NY Daily News rumor...link.

Link.

A few tidbits from the Nationals game notes.

+1

I think it was kinda obvious i was joking all along, Marshall is a good pitcher, but nowhere near Z. I think it is funny how much you all really got into this argument. whatever kid...don't try to back down now. :lol:

Thanks, man!

I'm going with TT in this match-up.

I'm not hard to find. Just ask around town for the biggest sob in town. They'll show you the way. If I'm not knocked over by the stink first. You live in W Monroe or Monroe? Monroe. Though, I'm not far from West Monroe. Just a few blocks from the bridge actually.

This could be my Waterloo. I'd appreciate all your votes, but if I lose to pinghitter...I'll have no regrets.

I'm not hard to find. Just ask around town for the biggest sob in town. They'll show you the way.

I'm hoping the Cards think Reyes needs a change of scenery and dump him for pennies on the dollar.

And a little more....

More from the game notes....

Game Notes

I bet he thinks Jacque Jones is a great player also. Nope. Jacque ain't white enough for this kid.

you mean idiotic, more proof of your lack of intelligence. No, I had it right the first time. if you were trying to insult me you should've said poster or user But that would be breaking forum rules, so I just insulted the post. aha but now your admitting insulting me, you just broke the rules. not that i care, insult me all day long. No I attacked your post. I called the post an idiot. Now whether posts that are idiots can spring forth from idiots, well that's an inference I'll leave for others to make.

you mean idiotic, more proof of your lack of intelligence. No, I had it right the first time. if you were trying to insult me you should've said poster or user But that would be breaking forum rules, so I just insulted the post.

So, why are you claiming Murton is so good then....he's not a major leaguer.

you mean idiotic, more proof of your lack of intelligence. No, I had it right the first time.

:lol:

The above post is an idiot.

2006 WHIP Zambrano: 1.29 Marshall: 1.52 Career WHIP Zambrano: 1.28 Marshall: 1.44 Marshall still holds the edge for 2007 based on a few nice starts, but that margin is closing fast and will probably disappear within the next 2 starts Still, Z led the league in walks. Doesn't say much for him and those whip is mostly hits for Marshall and walks for Z. Z's control doesn't look to improve but Marshall's "stuff" does. And even if Zambrano doesn't improve his control, he's still a better pitcher than Marshall. Even with Zambrano's control issues, he's still had those awesome seasons. Even with what you call great control by Marshall, his best would be the worst full season Zambrano has seen in 5 years! And when Marshall has those 5 years of experience we'll see whose better. All we're doing now is debating without fair statistical comparison. But in a lot of ways we are. We can compare each player to the other at the same age. When Zambrano was Marshall's age, he was dominating major league hitters. I'm trying to take you seriously, but it's laughable to think Marshall is now or ever will reach the level of pitching that Zambrano has achieved. I'm not asking you to agree with me i'm just giving my opinion, and on paper Marshall deserves all star more than Z. Well, Zambrano may not have deserved the ASG. That's debateable. But Marshall's 8 starts of 3.50 ERA doesn't make him all-star worthy in any shape or form...and in now way makes him a better pitcher now, in the past, or in the future than Zambrano. If you were using hyperbole to state your love for Marshall, you should have dropped the inane arguments a long time ago. Because if you think Marshall really is better than Zambrano, I'm having trouble wondering if this is the first year you've actually followed baseball. No, it's not. Then you should observe things a little more closely. Marshall is in no way the pitcher Zambrano is. or you could stop getting so worried about my knowledge and worry about yours Or I could just laugh at the fact that someone thinks Marshall is better than Zambrano. go ahead laughter is good for you, maybe it'll make you smarter I think the intelligence factor in this argument is self-evident.

2006 WHIP Zambrano: 1.29 Marshall: 1.52 Career WHIP Zambrano: 1.28 Marshall: 1.44 Marshall still holds the edge for 2007 based on a few nice starts, but that margin is closing fast and will probably disappear within the next 2 starts Still, Z led the league in walks. Doesn't say much for him and those whip is mostly hits for Marshall and walks for Z. Z's control doesn't look to improve but Marshall's "stuff" does. And even if Zambrano doesn't improve his control, he's still a better pitcher than Marshall. Even with Zambrano's control issues, he's still had those awesome seasons. Even with what you call great control by Marshall, his best would be the worst full season Zambrano has seen in 5 years! And when Marshall has those 5 years of experience we'll see whose better. All we're doing now is debating without fair statistical comparison. But in a lot of ways we are. We can compare each player to the other at the same age. When Zambrano was Marshall's age, he was dominating major league hitters. I'm trying to take you seriously, but it's laughable to think Marshall is now or ever will reach the level of pitching that Zambrano has achieved. I'm not asking you to agree with me i'm just giving my opinion, and on paper Marshall deserves all star more than Z. Well, Zambrano may not have deserved the ASG. That's debateable. But Marshall's 8 starts of 3.50 ERA doesn't make him all-star worthy in any shape or form...and in now way makes him a better pitcher now, in the past, or in the future than Zambrano. If you were using hyperbole to state your love for Marshall, you should have dropped the inane arguments a long time ago. Because if you think Marshall really is better than Zambrano, I'm having trouble wondering if this is the first year you've actually followed baseball. No, it's not. Then you should observe things a little more closely. Marshall is in no way the pitcher Zambrano is. or you could stop getting so worried about my knowledge and worry about yours Or I could just laugh at the fact that someone thinks Marshall is better than Zambrano.