I'll admit my report is skewed in favor of Holliman since I probably watched one of his best starts all season. I was at the May game at Mississippi. Holliman didn't allow a hit until the fifth inning and ended up going 8 innings while allowing only 2 hits with a 1/5 BB/K ratio. He wasn't overpowering, but he made a very good hitting Braves team look foolish. I don't always pay attention to the radar readings. I sat down the thirdbase line, so I'd have to make an effort to turn away from watching the plate to see the reading on the scoreboard. If I'm correctly remembering, Holliman threw between 88-91 on his fastball that night. Hart pitched the night before. He wasn't horrible, but he wasn't anything that made me sit up and take notice. He gave up some runs in the first, though it was a strange inning. He allowed a lead-off single to Holt and then had some stolen bases and even a CI call that led to Mississippi getting two in the first. He gave up another run in the third and after a scoreless fourth was out of the game. I went back and looked at the box score, and saw he gave up 6 hits in 4 IP, while giving up three runs. Only one of those was earned, but I probably didn't take much note of that when I was at the game. He walked five in those four innings, which is probably why I was less than impressed. His line isn't as nearly as bad as I remember it, but then the way he was lifted early and the struggles he had is why I probably left less than impressed with him. Add to that, the very next night I watched such a dominating performance by Holliman, and you can see why in my mind he was the better of the two. I don't have much recollection of Hart's stuff. But then, unlike when I watched Veal and Gallagher (and to some extents Petrick and Holliman), I wasn't particularly paying attention to it and since his performance in those four innings was relatively mediocre, nothing made me stop to see exactly what he was throwing.