Bertz
-
Posts
12,386 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
29
Content Type
Profiles
Joomla Posts 1
Chicago Cubs Videos
Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking
News
2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
Guides & Resources
2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
The Chicago Cubs Players Project
2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker
Blogs
Events
Forums
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by Bertz
-
Wisdom just hit a high fastball about a mile and a half to left center. If he can be just okay on pitches up going forward his odds of not turning into a pumpkin go WAY WAY up
-
-
Brett brought up the good point yesterday that the rotation seems to be lining up: Like Brett gets at I would think either Steele's not long for the rotation, or they're going 6-man to open the year and Miley's gonna slot in after Smyly. 6-man seems more likely at the moment. I kind of wonder if being able to go to a 15 man pitching staff made them largely abandon the piggybacking plan? Just run a normal (albeit bloated) bullpen with one long man, probably Thompson? But yeah I think that's the pen, probably one of Chavez/Gsellman, and one the Iowa guys. Probably Rucker, since he's generally been more of multi-inning guy?
-
Quiroz is a LH platoon bat who actually projects okay and has minor league options. That's not a lot but it's not nothing, particularly given the lack of LH bats the Cubs have hanging out at Iowa and Tenn. Fangraphs wrote him up earlier this week in fact
-
Whaddaya Seiya Suzuki (Signed with Cubs, 5/$85m)
Bertz replied to David's topic in Chicago Cubs Talk
-
-
-
Very easy to see the superficial Bregman comps
-
I think this is the biggest open question about the opening day roster. I thought previously you could fit Heyward on the roster along with everyone else at least until it went back down to 26. But now it sounds like the Cubs are going to do 15 pitchers/13 hitters to start the year. So, barring an injury, one of Heyard, Ortega, Hermosillo, or Frazier won't make the roster. Frazier is optionable, and so maybe it's as simple as that? The team under Jed has always waited as long as possible to make permanent moves.
-
Bryan is amazing, but it's really weird to me how he keeps trying to put Kilian at AA. Early in the offseason in his depth charts he had Espinoza at AAA and Kilian at AA, and now this. It's just a really weird thing to be so insistent on? Kilian had a damn near 7/1 K/BB at the level already last year, he's not going to start at Tennessee for the sake of Steven Brault
-
Always hard to tell for sure but seems to be one of the league's genuine good dudes
-
-
It does seem inevitable that the ghost runner is permanent. That said, this year is shaping up to be a bloodbath for pitchers, so it wouldn't crazy for the league to be actually telling the truth in this instance that this is temporary change to help not exacerbate things. Though next year the pitch clock is coming, and people are worried about that impact on injuries too...
-
-
-
Frazier is the guy the projections hate the most but ironically I feel like the easiest to talk yourself into qualitatively. I also wonder if there are things that can be done to help him out defensively. He was really good out there in '20, but bookended that by being awful in '19 and '21. Are there circumstances where he can excel, vs. others where he can't? E.g. he can't see the ball well under the lights, and so he should play the field in day games only.
-
-
It's largely the same list as Longenhagen, except Eric bumped Preciado and Alcantara up one more level, and I think they used different methodologies for converting grades into dollars
-
See you in June, Ethan
-
-
It seems like a mix of Yellich, Joc, Bellinger and Happ. Taller stance and a little open, arms high and kinda lanky and the finish kinda falling towards 1B dugout. Yeah I think Bellinger is who I was thinking. Bellinger is more uppercut-y but I think that's it
-
Feels like he's got a very familiar swing, but I can't quite place who I think it looks like
-
Good god, someone is gonna run a 17 man pitching staff aren't they
-
https://blogs.fangraphs.com/top-49-prospects-chicago-cubs-2/ The Cubs have 8 teenagers who are a 45 (a Generic Team's Top 10) caliber or better, and 4 of those are 50's (Top 100 Caliber). No other team FG has done so far has more than 4. Like I get that you wanna complain, nothing from the last 3-4 years makes that unreasonable, but you don't have to pull things out of your ass to complain about?
-
To echo, isn't this built in to the rankings all those websites do? People are acting like everyone just ignores the lower levels, when in reality they're just (correctly) discounting the potential down there because baseball is hard and most prospects fail, and the further away you are from the majors, the more chance you have to fail. I don't think anyone's ignoring that? That's basically the basis for the "wait til next year's rankings" comments that are getting dunked on. Like just to zoom in on the meat of the Cubs farm, this is the expected lineup at MB next year That's 8 guys with serious pedigree plus whoever the hell Felix Stevens is. Even after you lose ~3 of them to attrition this year, having ~5 of them jump a level or two is still a net win for the farm. A Kevin Alcantara type in Rookie Ball is a borderline top 100 type. A Kevin Alcantara type at AA is top 20/30. And it's those anchor guys who really drive the rankings.