17 Seconds
-
Posts
23,758 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
7
Content Type
Profiles
Joomla Posts 1
Chicago Cubs Videos
Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits
2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking
News
2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
Guides & Resources
2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks
The Chicago Cubs Players Project
2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker
Blogs
Events
Forums
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by 17 Seconds
-
this is some uggggllllyyy stuff. the crowd is so dead that you can literally hear individual people booing.
-
oh please pleeease pleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeease
-
Thome To The Twins
17 Seconds replied to Backtobanks's topic in MLB Draft, International Signings, Amateur Baseball
ive heard this before and i dont really understand where it comes from mauer morneau kubel span cuddyer ...are all good hitters, and if hardy puts up his 07-08 numbers, he's another. the twins scored the 5th most runs in all of baseball last year. they are a good offensive team. -
anybody else notice that cam barker looks like john cusack?
-
i'd have rather had harden than grabow/nady, but whatever. not a bad deal.
-
you mean the oilers zone, but eah... that was pretty awesome
-
amazingly well? he hits a bunch of singles 2009 vs RHP - .291/.344/.360 2008 vs RHP - .298/.355/.413 2006 vs RHP - .292/.339/.399 fontenot has a career OPS of like 35 points higher than inglett Say what you want, but for $500,000 a year, I would be very happy with those numbers for my left-handed #2 hitter against RHPs. Mike Fontenot might hit .236/.301/.377 again (last year's numbers) and get paid twice that. he also might be wayyyy better than inglett
-
amazingly well? he hits a bunch of singles 2009 vs RHP - .291/.344/.360 2008 vs RHP - .298/.355/.413 2006 vs RHP - .292/.339/.399 fontenot has a career OPS of like 35 points higher than inglett
-
all these old players need to just shut up. it's like one of them spoke so now they all think their opinion is important
-
They didn't wipe the floor. Chicago was in it until the end. The yardage isn't that meaningful, since that was essentially what the Bears were designed to do, give up yards but not the big play. lol wat Bend but don't break. The Bears led the NFL in turnovers (or was it turnover margin, or both?) in 05 and 06. yeah, but i dont see how you can ever say that "yardage isn't that meaningful". that's crazy. or that the bears were "designed to give up yards". no. maybe you could say they were designed to force turnovers BECAUSE they gave up a lot of yards. i dont really get how it's okay to give up a lot of yardage, as long as you stay away from the big play. most times, an 80 yards TD drive that takes 12 plays is no different than an 80 yard touchdown pass
-
They didn't wipe the floor. Chicago was in it until the end. The yardage isn't that meaningful, since that was essentially what the Bears were designed to do, give up yards but not the big play. lol wat
-
re: the kesler/ladd stuff http://sports.espn.go.com/chicago/nhl/news/story?id=4857548
-
i think it was randle el
-
honestly the only thing i remember about the steelers/seahawks super bowl were the badass chicken wings that some random person made where i watched it
-
awesome
-
that's fuckin deep bro
-
favre was definitely not good with the jets.
-
hartley is deucing in his pants
-
i think that's going to be incomplete, and its because of the terrible pass
-
brees looks terrrible
-
or a turnover
-
sean payton is a fuckin [expletive]
-
its forward progress, so its pretty much the same thing
-
this is a great game
-
would have been a first down if he caught it cleanly