A stat that was skewed because of their two blowout wins in back to back days. How many runs did the "best lineup ever" score in the last two games of the series? Great pitching, most of the time, beats great hitting. This series proved that fact. Well if that's the case then if you take out the last 2 games of the series, the Yankees averaged nearly 6 runs a game. 4 games proves nothing, especially the above which is far, far from a fact. While you're right about the 4 games proves nothing, 162 games does. The Tigers had the best staff in the league and that's how they reached the postseason. Their offense was very similar to the 2005 White Sox; heavily relying on the longball, and a very mediocre offense when they aren't hitting their solo homers. Their pitching definitely carried them to their 95 wins and ultimately has them in the ALCS. Good offenses do win championships; the Red Sox won in 2004. It just seems like to me that the teams that win the Series have a great staff and great pitching in general to rely on. The White Sox last year, the Marlins of 03, the Angels of 02, and the D'Backs of 01 all had outstanding pitching. I don't think it's a coincidence that those teams won it all. The Angels of 02 should be the poster child for good offense/bad pitching to the Series - they didn't have the starting pitching the Red Sox had. You think the Tigers remind you of the White Sox. I think the Tigers remind of the 03 Cubs and the 04-05 Astros. Not a good judge.