Jump to content
North Side Baseball

WrigleyField 22

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    19,067
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    16

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by WrigleyField 22

  1. Improbable isn't a strong enough word.
  2. Also 12 and 13 is a very strong point from which to wheel and deal from for probably any non-Williams prospect
  3. I agree with your btw, was just messing around on the Peterman bit. Just as a reference point, Howie Roseman flipped a broken and expensive Wentz for assets at a time when everyone wanted him to blow it up. But he's (aside from one week 16 game once) always trying new stuff to win and improve. And everyone wants The Process of the other Philly team that has yielded basically nothing of significance.
  4. Fields get hurt next week and Peterman has a 2017-Case-Keenum year. Oops. 😉
  5. Was curious how out this fanbase is so created a Twitter poll. Feel free to go vote
  6. I mean there's no logical point. It's an adherence to an ideal that is pointless. If they do fire Flus at some point mid-season, whichever assist draws up the most exotic blitz package gets the DC duties.
  7. Also, "we don't have the right culture for Jalen" 15 months into your culture building isn't a great look. Especially because coming off 2021 wasn't even a toxic culture environment like in 2014. Atrophying winning environment like in 2022 just sucked so bad. I never liked, but regrettably took a silver lining in tank tracking for #1 which just feels dumb now.
  8. I mean it's so much deeper than just one player, but yea.
  9. After watching Tim Jenkins breakdown,one possible explanation is a lot of no grades. The he pretty explicity called out Fields interception as a bad throw and PFF has no turnover worthy plays. So you'll occasionally have difference of opinions on assigning blame on a throw, but I tend to agree with Jenkins over PFF on that one.
  10. I mean, PFFs grading system is basically like any other scouting system ever created which is grading every play. Obviously not every scouting system is good and predictive! But to call their grade a stat isn't exactly right (other specific complaints non withstanding)
  11. Alex Smith would probably be my optimistic use case for Fields. He likewise had mostly bad coaching. Did have McCarthy as OC his first year but basically everything after that sucked (Nolan HC, then Singletary) until Harbaugh showed up and made him respectable and then Reid unlocked different level to legit good.
  12. He graded 71 as a passer and overall. Somehow his 1 of 8 deep passes got him a 75 grade on deep throws. Obviously one was the DJ drop which was I assume 1 of 2 BTT they graded him with. But that's still 2 of 8. They also didn't grade any throws as turnover worthy (respectively his first two games he had 1 BTT and 2 TWP in each). He also got his first good Fumble grade after two horrendous ones. Had a super high aDOT ....? Graded well on clean pockets where he was 10 of 15. Everything with blitz/pressure was terrible... Sooo - obviously PFF is a black box of how all these various metrics get collated into a single grade. And I can appreciate a process based system will get some big time anomies to results... But yea... It's a particulatly weird one! But the offense game plan beyond "lots of deep chucks" was so confusing at time I guess I'm not totally surprised a single metric spat out an absurd number on a 99 yard passing day. Will be interestimg to see the A-22 tape watchers take. Both O Sullivan and Jenkins, while definitely critical of Fields have maintained a "more blame on coaching" standpoint through first 2 weeks.
  13. Found elsewhere. You decide if we simply have the next Chuck Noll or a bad coach Coaches with 13 Straight Losses or MoreSuper Bowl Era26 GamesJohn McKay 1976-77 Tampa Bay Buccaneers. Retained.17 GamesHue Jackson, 2016-17 Cleveland Browns. Retained for 2018 season.Rod Marinelli, 2007-08 Detroit Lions. Fired after season.16 GamesBill Peterson, 1972-73 Houston Oilers. Fired after starting 1973 out 0-5.Chuck Noll, 1969-70 Pittsburgh Steelers. Retained.15 GamesDoug Marrone, 2020 Jacksonville Jaguars. Fired after season.George Seifert, 2001 Carolina Panthers. Fired after season.14 GamesHue Jackson, 2016 Cleveland Browns. Retained.Mike McCormack, 1981 Baltimore Colts. Fired after season.13 GamesMatt Eberflus, 2022-23 Chicago Bears. Still coaching.Rod Dowhower, 1986 Indianapolis Colts. Fired during the season.Rod Rust, 1990 New England Patriots. Fired after season.Adam Gase, 2020 New York Jets. Fired after season.Kay Stephenson, 1983-84 Buffalo Bills. Fired after season.Chip Kelly, 2016 San Francisco 49ers. Fired after season.Jim Caldwell, 2011 Indianapolis Colts. Fired after season.Cam Cameron, 2007 Miami Dolphins. Fired after season.
  14. Draft him and have him sit a whole year and watch Fields so he understands exactly what he can't get away with anymore.
  15. Well a lot about Emerys situation was unique too, none that really apply to Poles. And yea, it was a really early cut bait.
  16. I'm committed to not personally spend all season tank watching again, but I know some here will be interested so I'll pass along those odds when I see it:
  17. Listing a college OC? That is a Hella deep cut.
  18. They thew Fields under bus this season? 2022 for sure. But they did actually more or less support him in 2023. Just too little too late. It's pretty rare for GMs to not even see out their second coach and a QB investment of their own. And there's normally extenuating circumstances like a weird power struggle or power dynamic from the beginning. Unless the power struggle that goes down is with Warren, I don't see it happening.
  19. The best thing I can say about George is he has been fairly agressive since he took over. Incompetent, but not passive. Honestly I think a big reason that Nagy wasn't fired in season was just that he was contemplating Pace's future until the very end. He wasn't going to make one decision final before the other I think. If he feels like he is still backing Poles, an in season firing may make more sense since Poles can get a head start. Of course it could also end up a solely Poles decision as to fire mid year or not (if he has the confidence of Warren/George)
  20. I've never put too much behind their history and tradition. I think they were pushed close with both Trestman and Nagy and eventually it will give. George has been at head for 12 years now (and failing) and has a new external president. At some point it will given and they'll do the in-year firing.
  21. Yea, Rivera is best they "let get away". Some of their personnel guys from the mid-90s (when they operated without a GM) went on to have some okay success, but certainly not in a regretful way. Doubt Poles ever gets another chance, unless, similar to Nagy, he heads back to KC and just waits to be next in line of succession. Wild card thought is Cunningham who many fans have been banking on getting comp draft picks from and viewed as a hot candidate. This season either tarnishes his reputation or Bears cend up cutting him loose (with FO overhaul) before he ever can convert into comp picks.
  22. I've definitely considered that as well (Claypool trade being an obvious piece of evidence). Then the Ogunjobi signing he initially committed to before backing out. Be hilarious/sad if missing Ogunjobi (and also rumors he missed narrowly on that Rams center) just started series of misses he's been flailing wildly at ever since.
  23. Looks like at least the season predictions moved over to ESPN, but not game by game Elo predictions. https://www.espn.com/nfl/fpi/_/view/projections So 5.2-11.8 projected W-L. "Only" 3rd worse, with Carolina and Denver having slightly worse projections. So yea, an awful by all metrics Denver team. Also reeling. You get them at home instead of having to play at altitude at mile high. The Bears either win Q1 and start the momentum ball early, or the booing may not end all season. Also found individual game predictions. So between Vegas and ESPN, the short term out look for Bears is: 1. 20-22% chance they get a short term turnaround and enter mini-bye at 2-3. That saves everyones asses for a bit, I'd think. 2. 28-30% chance they are 0-5 and would be absolutely reeling, and then I think in season change really has a good chance. 3. 48-52% chance the are 1-4, with perhaps mixed bag, but still bad enough that you aren't thinking in-season turn around
  24. Funniest possible outcome of all this. I should have known not to give and and actively be happy for the tank last year.
  25. So current backups, basically (with Mac not playing full game)
×
×
  • Create New...