You mostly get used to it, but it's always a little frustrating. The best explanation I've ever gotten is that neurotypicals speak in vibes. The actual words aren't important, they are just vehicles for the general feeling being conveyed. So to me, "Justin fields coming out of college was better than Bryce young coming out of college" is a completely different statement from, and this is the exact quote from the third link: "Mhmmm can’t make a statement like that. I’ll be shocked if Chicago don’t trade back or don’t go above and beyond to build around Justin!” But they both generally convey a pro-fields vibe, so to a lot of people, they are apparently functionally equivalent? Actually, if you go back and click through to Parson's actual tweet, he was specifically saying he *couldn't* say that fields is better than young, but he still thinks the bears should build around fields. So besides not being a draft expert, which is what we were talking about, it involved the player being quoted directly refusing to say the thing most draft experts are allegedly saying. But linking it and saying "lol due diligence" felt like a rebuttal, it had the vibe of a rebuttal,.so the actual words didn't matter. i often have issues similar to this and do my best to filter it out probably why that whole robot thing started