Jump to content
North Side Baseball

David

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    32,468

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by David

  1. David
    Oh and that was deadline day, July 2004, duh.
  2. David
    Some posts that I know that are mine are showing up as Guest. I wonder if that's got something to do with my screwed up post count.
  3. David
    Man, it would be worth it just to get this back.
  4. David
    But only on some posts...Quoting myself because I can't edit lol
  5. David
    It's there for me now.
  6. David
    Also my post count is wayyyyyy down but I'm assuming that's because we only have the archive posts loaded up.
  7. David
    Yeah, mine are not that. I have share/report on top right, multiquote on bottom left, and something about signature preferences on bottom right. I'm not complaining, because I'm sure stuff is still in progress, but just saying mine doesn't match that. I'm using Chrome on a Mac btw.
  8. David
  9. David
    truth be told iirc it was because of me complaining about the histrionics in the game threads (especially once the team was so damn good that the day to day didn't matter) i mean who could EVER find that annoying lol?
  10. David
    would love to know how i got tagged with the robot monicker especially in this of all places
  11. David
    I am just positive you are smart enough to realize that just about everyone here wouldn't want the Bears to take Stroud at #9 if he were somehow available there, regardless of their draft philosophy. Correct. Which is why I've always found the "BPA" takes irritating. People didn't really mean it, they would just say it if it happened to fit the argument for whatever player they wanted to draft or draft pick they wanted to defend in the moment. But at least now I know that *they* know they don't mean it, that you're supposed to adjust for "nuance" to whatever seems obvious regardless of what was said. I'm working on adjusting to that. BPA means don't reach for poor value in the name of need
  12. David
    you're self aware enough to know that you do this "taking everything too literally" thing, but you don't do anything to adjust for it? or are you knowingly just doing it to do this kyle thing you do on here This is me admitting that I misunderstood and that my misunderstanding was the cause of disagreement, and that I now know my previous understanding was wrong. What more do you want here? I am just positive you are smart enough to realize that just about everyone here wouldn't want the Bears to take Stroud at #9 if he were somehow available there, regardless of their draft philosophy.
  13. David
    You thought this was yahoo draft set to auto pick? I thought "best player available" meant "best player available," yes. you're self aware enough to know that you do this "taking everything too literally" thing, but you don't do anything to adjust for it? or are you knowingly just doing it to do this kyle thing you do on here
  14. David
    this is where you use common sense and realize that nobody advocating for BPA wants the bears to take a QB at #9 if one is available. what it means is don't reach for someone at the pick if the value isn't there just because it's a position of greater need. in the bears case, if the available OL/DL guys are guys you don't have valued anywhere near a #9 pick but a great corner who you have with top 10 value is available, take the corner or look at trade down options. if the guys available at the pick are valued closely, then break the tie with wherever you feel you have the most need. what is nuance?
  15. David
    Same domain but the URL structure will change a bit. The front page will be news - as it is now, but active - while the forums will be at /forums/ instead of the current /forum/. And then there will be loads of other stuff that's all new. Small but big change as far as the URL so thanks for that info. I don't think Tim would be surprised to hear that we all (or at least most) go straight to the forum url and skip the front page entirely. horsefeathers, i go straight to active topics
  16. David
    seeing all this back and forth going with tom, it just occurred to me that conor orr called the bears a top 10 skill position group after the moore trade. i'm not sure if it got discussed at all when it happened. seems a bit high to me but I also see where it's probably a good deal better than most think. it's more than fair to want to wait to see how mooney comes back from the injury and to be skeptical of claypool after last year, though. i'm pretty comfortable saying i expect him to do well as a #3/2a (however it works out with mooney), particularly with something to prove for a contract. https://www.si.com/nfl/2023/03/14/nfl-chicago-bears-acing-pivotal-offseason
  17. David
  18. David
    while being as careful as I can not to read his posts too closely, he said mooney isn't an outside guy
  19. David
    I sure wish I new what was on that video you can't just click into it?
  20. David
    Whats a 11 win offense with a 1 win DL? what about a 9-10 win secondary/lbs in the mix? we're really experting now
  21. David
    people keep saying that fields and the offense faded down the stretch after his breakout, but what also coincided with that fade was losing darnell mooney (and claypool)
  22. David
    and what horsefeathering experts? the draft hasn't even happened yet. who is even predicting regular season wins at this point? or are you just talking about wrigley in this thread taking the pythag record from last year and adding the win that some model says the bears gained from their moves so far?
  23. David
    https://www.si.com/nfl/chiefs/gm-report/pass-rush-vs-pass-coverage
  24. David
    Everyone here except Derwood knows that. That's why what I took issue with was the "unless something miraculous happens" nonsense.
  25. David
    It's not going to take a miracle to finish out of the bottom 1/3 FFS
×
×
  • Create New...