Most people around these parts I think could agree on one thing about the Cubs roster this offseason. It had a pretty decent structure of supporting players, but was short on star power. In a given year there are about 45 guys who put up a 5+ fWAR, that seems like a reasonable(and simple!) definition to use. Using that threshold, the Cubs have had 3 star seasons in the last 4 years(Dempster '08, Lee '09, Garza '11). That's at least 3 fewer than expected, and really cuts to why the Cubs have struggled to win the last 2 years. So we need more star players, which is a lot easier to say than it is to fix. Let's take a look at the means in which teams acquire those players. Before we begin, take a minute and guess what percentage of these player seasons come from which category: Players who come from the team's minor league system - Homegrown Players traded to the team after reaching the Major Leagues - Traded Players signed as Free Agents from other teams - Free Agent Now that you have your perception in mind, let's see what the results are. The last 3 years there have been 126 player seasons of 5 or greater fWAR. Homegrown - 79 - 63% Traded - 30 - 24% Free Agent - 17 - 13% That is honestly not the percentages I would've guessed. Even more interesting is the nature of the players acquired in FA or trade. Of the 17 FA player seasons, half of them come from guys who were pulled off the scrap heap. Chris Carpenter, Jayson Werth, Aubrey Huff, Kelly Johnson, none of those guys had bidding wars for there services when they were added by their teams. The traded players are a bit more of the expected variety, but there's still guys like Jose Bautista, Brandon Phillips, Franklin Gutierrez, and Jhonny Peralta who turn out surprise seasons. So what's the point of this exercise? At the start of the offseason, I wanted the team to go aggressively into free agency and get a star bat and pitcher, allowing their performance to make the team competitive right away while buying time for the revamped farm system to produce stars down the line. After seeing how the new front office(full of people smarter and more knowledgeable than me) approached the offseason, and the results you see above, I'm a little more at peace with 2012 being a disappointment from a W-L perspective. Don't get me wrong, ultimately the front office needs to be accountable to the end product. If they do nothing but make efficient moves for 3 years and win 75 games, then that's a problem. But considering the circumstances of this roster(no stars, many of the best role players one year from free agency), I'm more willing to accept the approach of adding young MLB ready players to try and find some better long term pieces before being too disappointed in the team not shelling out big dollars in free agency.