I would argue that a top tier everyday player is more valueable than a pitcher (even an ace). That's not an even trade in my eyes; the Cubs would have to get more. Santana only pitches onces every 5 days and the Cubs are not 1 pitcher away from a World Series Championship. Lee gets 4-5 Plate appearances and several fielding chances everyday, but Santana faces 20-25+ batters every 5 days. If they were willing to trade Santana for Lee, we'd be stupid not to. Sorry, I just don't view it that way. Lee has the opportunity to impact the game daily while Santana can only do so every 5 days. I think this all boils down to people not believing that Lee will duplicate this season. I doubt the same trade talks would be said about Pujols, Sammy (in his prime), or a host of other top tier players. Lee is not making that much money therefore trading him deteriorates the infield defensively and the team offensively. Derrek Lee is the type of player teams build around. The Cubs can solve their problems without making any changes at the infield corners. Lee also turns 30 next week and will be a free agent after next season who will likely command more than he's worth. And yes, there's plenty of reason to believe that Lee won't repeat next season, whether it's his career numbers, his regression in the second half, his lucky BABIP/LD numbers, etc. I agree that we can improve the team without trading Lee, all I'm pointing out is that it might be an opportunity to improve the team if we can get more value out of him. For example, if we were able to spin Lee for A-Rod + Cash(example only, not saying it's feasible or likely) and then make a deal for Overbay, that would be significantly better than Lee at 1B and whoever at SS. Great, now I'm going to be thinking about a deal that would work all morning. Me and my imagination making sense :x.