won't somebody please make a comment like this and actually state your case. back this up with some analysis please. Your constant badgering of people to backup with analysis is bordering on trolling for arguments. The analysis has been stated, repeatedly. trolling. whatever. I could make a stronger case that constant whining without backing it with an argument is closer to trolling than anything I am doing here. no, no analysis has been given other than this macro genernalization type bs. nobody has said the Cubs will be terrible and then gone on to give their own projections on a player by player or position by position analysis, or even Pecota (which I understand isn't even out yet) or Zips projections. I did. projected to 800+ runs. it stirs no discussion. it elicited no mia culpa. is just bitching really that much more interesting than discussing why that will or will not be? you want to whine about how bad the Cubs will be, but won't put your overwhelming knowledge to work, come up with some projections for where the players will finish, from that determine where they will be at the end of September. I really thought that's what the purpose of this discussion board was. reasoned analysis and debate before baseless conjecture and hyperbole. are you freaking blind? The post you are referencing said they had a realistic shot for .500 and could contend for the division with a few breaks. whine, whine, whine, blah, blah, blah. The Cubs are a work in progress. They've sucked for two years, and have made some improvements, but they've got a ways to go to have any realistic expectations for greatness. If you want to complain, once again, that that is not enough analysis therefore I'm just complaining unnecessarily, so be it. http://rambusek.webpark.pl/grafika/humor/catfight.jpg