I can't argue that the Cubs have lacked direction and focus. I don't agree with your apparent belief that Hendry is the ultimate source of this, however. I don't really like the job Jimbo has done either, anyone who has read my posts knows this. But the fact is, there have been many other GMs and the results have been similar. I'm a believer that organizations are built from the top down. The overall direction and long-term strategy of the Cubs (i.e. who we want to "be" as a baseball franchise) must come from the top level. And that's the Trib. I don't subscribe to --- and never will --- the idea that owners are simply a financial resource and little else. Yes, the GM is an important part. But he is hired by the owners, and will for the most part carry forth the vision of those owners----whether consciously, or (more dangerously) subconsciously. So while I agree the plan/direction has not been there, I'm not convinced there's going to be one until the Trib either undergoes a massive overhaul of the way they choose to run this team, or alternatively sells the team. As for those who correctly point out the Cubs were ranked the #1 farm system not too many years ago: it would have been nice to capitalize on that with an overall organizational strategy that made sense. But we didn't, instead raping the farms by selling them off for questionable talent. In the meantime, the Cubs still never had a focus on position talent even when they were ranked highly -- which has directly lead to our current need to spend massive amounts of money on position talent.