No, it's not Jones's job to correct this. I completely disagree. He should never, ever deal with a reporter in an adversarial situation. Jones should let the media relations staff deal with this. If the staff dealt with it, and they felt it was still unresolved to their satisfaction, then Hendry approaching Sullivan might be appropriate. But without knowing the chain of events and conversations, I don't think it's fair to cast judgment on Hendry. And, I don't blame Sullivan for leaking it, by the way. There's a reason you don't pick fights with people who buy ink by the barrell. I think this is a unique situation because they both work for the same company, though. I think someone with less juice within the organization probably would have been a better choice to confront Sullivan (if, in fact, it was erroneous-which is debatable), because there is certainly a conflict of interest here and an unstable power breakdown. If you really think that, then you should look at each and every article by the Tribune is a conflict of interest. Look, you don't have to think much of Sullivan as a reporter, Hendry as a GM or the Tribune as a paper, but don't attack anyone's integrity in this situation. This was not, and is not, a conflict of interest situation. While the Tribune and the Cubs are all owned by the same company, Hendry is not McGrath or Sullivan's boss. They don't report to Hendry, and the leadership of the paper is NOT going to sanction, fire, or remove them based on Hendry's, MacPhail's or Panazzo's anger.