Is VORP a good stat to use for pitchers? Because last year he was 34th in the league. 34th among starters? That makes no sense. So he's a number 2? He said 34th in the league, not in baseball. If that's 34th among starting pitchers, then I don't get it. How could there have possibly been 33 starters in the NL ahead of him last season? Notice he said pitchers, rather than starting pitchers. In other words, according to the VORP he used, Hill last season was the 34th overall best pitcher in VORP, rather than 34th best starting pitcher. However, I'd like to see more about this ranking, such as if it's the old VORP (meaning relievers get significantly better treatment) or what sample size cutoffs were used for pitchers.