I agree on almost all counts, except the idea that he did it with peavy in mind. Hendry usually seems pretty straight forward with us (us=fanbase) about what he's thinking. That is, he may not always be forthcoming with info but when he does talk about transactions he usually doesn't B.S. us. Or so it seems. Anyway, my point is that every time I heard him talk this offseason (mainly at the convention) the way he explained it was that he moved DeRosa out of necessity - not related to Peavy. The way he put it was that there was a general consensus that we needed to be more 'left handed.' That means saying goodbye to at least one of the righties on the team. Obviously Lee, Ramirez, and Soriano weren't going anywhere. That left DeRosa, pretty much. (or theriot, I guess). Getting rid of DeRosa was essentially a way of putting two lefties in the lineup for the price of one righty in that Fontenot could step into his place at second plus it freed up the money for Bradley. Certainly I think Hendry wanted Peavy but the more I hear Jim talk the more I believe that his intentions in trading DeRosa actually did not involve Peavy.