Jump to content
North Side Baseball

UMFan83

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    95,285
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    73

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by UMFan83

  1. According to Weather.com, it doesnt seem like the real strong stuff will hit until 10pm. There is a window of rain and thunder in the 8:00 hour but then nothing at 9. If those reports are accurate i think we will ge this in.
  2. Or how the 1970 Cubs were within a half game of first as late as Sept 4th (Game 137), within a game of first as late as September 15th (game 146) and within 1.5 games as late as September 19th (Game 151). Then they lost 7 of 9 to fall 6 games out before winning their last 2 meaningless games. To compare...in 1969 after 137 games, the Cubs were up 5 games, after game 146 they were down 2.5 games, after game 151 they were 4 games out.
  3. Hawks will raise the banner October 7th against the Rangers
  4. I think it's unnecessary. Agreed - though I like the general concept of wanting to have our best bullets available for STL, every win we can get is important. If it's late August or September, and a sweep could get us into a tie with them or something, you might be on to something, but it's too early to think like that. If you spot start someone like Wood or Jackson, they probably won't be able to give you more than 5 innings, meaning you risk taxing the pen before the Cardinals series.
  5. OK I now officially hate them after seeing them on the players
  6. Yeah they got Greinke out of the game after 6 innings by making him throw over 100 pitches. Good stuff
  7. We've gotta be closing in on an '08 date. ETA: 9 over was our highwater mark in '09. Yeah I pointed out the other day, if they can get to 11 over 500, they will be at the highwater mark for any season besides 2008 since 2004. For fun, Cubs highwater mark for since 2000: 2000: 1 2001: 19 2002: 0 2003: 15 2004: 21 2005: 6 2006: 5 2007: 10 2008: 35 2009: 9 2010: 0 2011: 1 2012: 0 2013: 1 2014: 0 2015: 9
  8. Probably were offered more money. Apparently WGN was in the running for the Sox too...would have been funny to have the Cubs on 670 and the Sox on 720 after the last 10 years of it being reversed.
  9. You know what's funny? I feel like I should hate them more than I do. Every fiber in my being is telling me to hate them, but I don't think I do...please dont hate me.
  10. Awesome, we will get extra coverage on that station now.
  11. Err isn't Jansen their closer? And they used him in a high leverage situation.
  12. Kershaw and Greinke? Psssh no problem
  13. Whatever you do don't GIDP. We need Rizzo to hit if you can't do it
  14. Denofria has 100 points lower OPS and like triple the K rate against righties. Edit: yes this is a reverse jinx
  15. Dammit baxer how long does it take to freaking run 90 feet
  16. You typically don't squeeze when there's a force at home Suicide squeeze? I could be wrong but yeah that was always my impression
  17. You typically don't squeeze when there's a force at home
  18. Addy has to get this done. Denofria is the guy we don't want against righties right?
  19. Did you forget Russell ? Yes and Denofria apparently. I have moments like that too, but I'm old. What's your excuse ? Alcohol
  20. Did you forget Russell ? Yes and Denofria apparently. Forgot he's pinch hitting and not the lead off guy
  21. I'm totally fine with a bunt here with Rizzo up next followed by Bryant. The one time I'm mostly ok with it.
×
×
  • Create New...