I disagree with people saying it's all Dusty and the Cubs' fault. But I think you're just as wrong for saying Dusty shares no blame. The leadoff thing played a huge role. It was an example of the Cubs obviously not noticing his weaknesses, and putting him in a spot that would shine a light on his faults and ignore his favorables. Obviously you are wrong when you say his average will always be low and his SLG will always be low. His OBP will always be low, but in 2003 his .298 AVG and .511 SLG showed they didn't always have to be low. Corey could be a guy who hits .280/.320/.500 without changing a whole lot. He could still rack up the Ks. You're allowing his 2005 to completely erase his others years, when in fact, a happy medium between 2003 and 2004 is both very possible and acceptable. But the Cubs wanted him to hit .300 at the expense of power, which makes no sense because a lot of his ability to hit for some average despite the K's is his ability to hit homeruns. They completely went back on their original plan not to ask him to be a slap hitter. They screwed him up. Maybe he would have screwed himself up eventually. And I definitely never liked his approach in the first place. But when the team already stresses such an approach, it's tough to fault a guy for failing to fix his problems. I failed to see a difference no matter where he hit in the line up. It was the same old Corey flailing away at curves that bounced before the plate, and at balls that were above his eyes. I never saw him act like a lead off hitter. Did you ever see him shorten his stroke to put the ball in play? What was his swing like with 2 strikes, did he try to take that outside pitch and dump it into left field, or was he trying to put it in the RF bleachers? Maybe it was the move to lead off that screwed him up, but it appeared to me that he was already on that slippery slope, and the move to lead off was another bump in his road. Corey seemed more than willing to move to leadoff. I think he would have done anything at that point to reverse the direction that he was already headed. That said I would have liked to keep him and use him off the bench in a platoon and for a defensive replacement. There is no way that his value could have been lower than it was at the trade. He will do better this year with the O's; there is hardly a way that he couldn't.