Are the other 2B options out there really all THAT much better? I would have taken the chance on Iwamura myself, but otherwise you have-- 1. An old Ray Durham, who is physically at risk and will command more $$ than DeRosa. 2. Mark Loretta, who will likely make about the same $$, but is a 2B only. DeRosa doesn't HAVE to be your starting 2B to still bring value to the team (though admittedly, he'll be an expensive super-sub in that scenario). 3. Soriano. There's no way Fonzie is ever going back to 2B. 4. Nomar. He was never that good defensively at his NATURAL position, now he's going to try and play his 4th position in three years? Serious injury risk, and we've been down that path before (though I love Nomar). 5. Orlando Hudson? Meh. 6. Ryan Theriot? I love the kid, but we got burned last year in reading too much into a hot month and a half from Cedeno in late 05. You can't risk that again. 7. Ronnie Belliard? Ugh. 8. Marcus Giles? At least DeRosa's peripherals are IMPROVING each year. Giles keeps getting worse. And haven't we learned that Atlanta is usually pretty astute at knowing when to cut bait with their own players. 9. Todd Walker? Haha. 10. Rich Aurilia? Now, I actually wouldn't have minded this one so much, as he can play 3B obviously too, but he will almost certainly be more expensive in $$ without THAT much marginal improvement in play compared to DeRosa. So I dislike me some Hendry big time, that is no secret, but it appears they used some logical analysis here and made what they thought was the best move, can't fault him for that. If DeRosa could duplicate his 06 performance, then everyone is happy and he's a bargain at $4MM. And he DOES bring that super-sub flexibility, every team needs one, and Lou is on record as WANTING one. Nope, not gonna slam Hendry on this one. As is his want, the LENGTH of the contract was ill-advised, that's the worst part of the deal, but the $$ or the player selection doesn't throw me into full panic mode. Yet.