Yeah, where to start ... Oh I know, how about that he hit those ten homers at a greater rate than the 21? Was he using steroids in 2001 when he hit 10 homers in 105 at-bats as a part-time DH, or in 2005 when he hit 21 in 311 at-bats after he gave up pitching? I think one could speculate that he was indeed using back then. If he ordered a year's supply of HGH in 2004, why would he stop taking it in 2005? Because it was illegal then? Maybe, I guess. One thing I find interesting about this story- and warning here- I have no facts to back this up, just theory- He's getting some sympathy, and not just here- Mike Golic said this morning that hey, the guy was recovering from surgery about that time, it's not like he was in great shape and took something to be even better (I guess read Barry Bonds/ Giambi into that) he was just a poor fella trying to get better and have another shot at MLB. But my theory is this- I'll wager that a high, high percentage of HGH users have used steroids. And I'll wager that very few steroid users in comparison have used HGH. Steroids are far easier to get. I'm not sure what any of that means, but the argument that HGH wasn't banned in 2004 is pretty close to the steroids weren't banned in 2001 argument. And, I'd be stunned if a guy used HGH and never ever touched a steroid.