I think Valbuena absolutely is a starter next year and that we would be crazy to trade him this off-season. The way I see it: Either Bryant goes to the outfield and Valbuena starts at third, or Bryant sticks at third and one of Castro or Baez is traded in a package for Stanton, in which case Valbuena slides over to second. Clearly, those aren't the only options and it might be myopic, but I think we obtain the most value out of our roster by doing one of those two things. Unless someone can convince me otherwise, then I see no reason Valbuena wouldn't start for us next year. Then, Russell can come up later on next year and get time wherever, and Valbuena can be a super-utility guy, playing some outfield, as well. We can revisit the Valbuena trade market next off-season, if everything goes to plan, and it looks like he might be in line for 200 PA instead of 500+ in 2016. Yes, his value drops considerably with only one year of control left, but we just aren't to the point of worrying about shipping off 3-win guys right now. Maybe you can use Valbuena in a trade for pitching this off-season, instead. But, I just don't see it. I think he brings the most value as a member of our roster next season.