Strop has had his blowups too though and occasionally struggles with control. Maybe not as frequently or as bad as Carl but Carl has better overall stuff when he's on, and when he's off its mostly a control thing, he still doesnt usually get hit hard. I dunno I guess there is no ideal answer, and Strop has been mostly fine as closer and certainly has paid his dues in the Cubs pen. Yeah, I don't think it matters too much. Strop, Edwards, and Cishek are all very good but we don't have that one elite guy at the end. I agree Carl is the better pitcher between he and Strop. Cishek might be, too. But I feel like Cishek is more of a Swiss Army knife that can fill multiple different roles. It doesn't matter too much which roles they are in for me, because they are similar talent-wise and will all be relied on a lot. If one fucks up, I don't care too much if they ruin it in the 8th or the 9th. I do think Carl's blowups are different than Strop's though. That might just be my perception. And there could be some recency bias from something like last night. But I feel like Pedro has had a number of incidents where we've been on pins and needles; he's maybe put a couple guys on and then grinded his way through or suddenly found it and started striking guys out. When Carl doesn't have it, it always seems untenable to me. Again, it probably doesn't matter too much who is doing it in the 8th and who in the 9th. But I feel like if there is one option whose best fit is as a 1-inning guy reserved for the 9th, it's probably Strop. They're all very different, though, with Strop having the nasty slider, Carl with his curve and spin, Cishek with the weird delivery. They'd be best utilized not having defined roles.