Jump to content
North Side Baseball

minnesotacubsfan

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    25,068

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by minnesotacubsfan

  1. minnesotacubsfan
    I'm beginning to think I should be the kicker for GB. its all chance, really, and it pays better then my current position.
  2. minnesotacubsfan
    my god, you're being so annoyingly contrarian at this point it couldn't have made the kick any worse. Crosby kicks the ball, it goes right towards the upright, odds are like 48% it goes left, 48% it sneaks in, and like 4% or something it just clanks off the post I.E. COIN FLIP A.K.A. LUCK, HOW MUCH CLEARER CAN I MAKE THIS Crosby has no control over not kicking it at the goal post in the first point? this isn't just "bad luck"
  3. minnesotacubsfan
    all of them, because McCarthy would have chosen them to.
  4. minnesotacubsfan
    The Packers lost those 6 games by a combined 20 points. Has there been a team in history whose average margin of defeat was lower? Really? Is that a real question? I'll just give you some of the easy-math answers: 1984 49ers: 3 1998 Vikings: 3 1985 Bears: 14 2004 Steelers: 17 This year's Ravens lost 4 games by a combined 16 points, so they were right there with the Packers in margin of defeat. Average margin of defeat is what I am going for. I realize there might be some 15-1 team that lost a game by 3 points, but I guess that's not really the same since the Packers had 6 losses. so, the more loses you have, the better (or at least more acceptable) your average margin of defeat becomes? or is 6 a magic number? I'm so confused....I keep thinking its better to win games then to lose them.
  5. minnesotacubsfan
    ha! he probably should. but I don't think the 162 vs 16 game argument is necessarily null and void. I think it becomes more applicable to baseball then it does football because of the instances (or games played). It could also suggest that a fluke year by a team is more likely to show as an anomaly in the statistics due to untimely bad decisions that cause more losses. aka, the packers statistics suggest they are very good, but their coach makes very poor decisions and they lose a lot. That doesn't project that they will do well in the playoffs, but it does explain that at some point, their coach will likely make a catastrophic decision (or series of decisions) and they will lose despite their amazing statistics..
  6. minnesotacubsfan
    they have the 2nd best point differential in all of football, despite a tough schedule (like the rest of the NFCN) Oh. Then the losses don't count. you're being purposefully dense. nowhere did i suggest that. why do we all freely accept pythagorean record for baseball as a much better indicator of the quality of a team's performance, but you're seemingly shrugging off point differential like it's [expletive]? 162 games vs 16 games. SAMPLE SIZE also, McCarthy is amazing as choking, according to our Packer brethren.
  7. minnesotacubsfan
    I agree with you on this
  8. minnesotacubsfan
    where we pick, who would be an impact LT? I've read that this draft inst deep on that position ..?
  9. minnesotacubsfan
    But yet, they have Atlanta as their number 2 team. I'm confused. http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/03/week-17-power-rankings/ maybe Chicago is their sentimental favorite
  10. minnesotacubsfan
    not at all. I was just re-capping what I thought elco was likely to hear. not really telling you to get the [expletive] out.
  11. minnesotacubsfan
    I suppose you think they all look alike. NFL coaches or comedians?
  12. minnesotacubsfan
    lol: http://www.jsonline.com/sports/packers/112790314.html
  13. minnesotacubsfan
    get the [expletive] out of here jagoff!!!!
  14. minnesotacubsfan
    it doesn't make me a bad man if I troll Jersey on Monday mornings, does it?
  15. minnesotacubsfan
    Some things are common sense, you know. The cynical trolling gets tiresome after a while. In my defense, I only troll jersey on monday mornings.
  16. minnesotacubsfan
    I see what you've done there. And I like it.
  17. minnesotacubsfan
    Ooo k? Sorry, I'm just reacting to his overblown schpiel on ATH about how Seattle is tarnishing the NFL's "integrity." yea. they should have laid down for the Rams. wtf
  18. minnesotacubsfan
    that guy could draft.
  19. minnesotacubsfan
    He wasn't getting fired, even if we lost yesterday. no, you're right. I remember that discussion now. It was instead you wished he would get replaced.
  20. minnesotacubsfan
    am I the only one who kept thinking Frazier looked like this guy during the Monday night game vs Chicago?: http://denverchan.org/src/1227211146343.jpg eta, the pic: http://extras.mnginteractive.com/live/media/site569/2010/1220/20101220__101221Vike1_300.jpg
  21. minnesotacubsfan
    its that Trojan Affect. The SeaHoks are awesome now.
  22. minnesotacubsfan
    I thought Angelo was taking a lesser role as the draft-guy this year? I thought they hired someone earlier this season to handle that?
  23. minnesotacubsfan
    too old, draft a WR (or 2)
  24. minnesotacubsfan
    6-0 AND possibly loosing your coach. gotta love Sweet Ol' Al Davis.
  25. minnesotacubsfan
    think football, Bob. I realize Iowa has different standards, but think football.
×
×
  • Create New...