Jump to content
North Side Baseball

minnesotacubsfan

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    25,105
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by minnesotacubsfan

  1. Has anyone actually looked up Wrigleys dimensions? Turns out, it's pretty damn symmetrical Left Field - 355 ft (108.2 m) Left-Center Field - 368 ft (112.2 m) Center Field - 400 ft (121.9 m) Right-Center Field - 368 ft (112.2 m) Right Field - 353 ft Idk, seems like such a stupid argument to be having.
  2. I agree. I also love that stadium.
  3. Yea, it is. I love that stadium. Left Field - 330 feet (101 m) Medium Left-Center - 360 feet (110 m) True Left-Center - 375 feet (114 m) Center Field - 400 feet (122 m)* True Right-Center - 375 feet (114 m) Medium Right-Center - 360 feet (110 m) Right Field - 330 feet (101 m) Backstop - 55 feet (17 m)
  4. Isn't dodger stadium pretty close to symmetrical?
  5. I've never heard of this...."cannabis"
  6. I like Toon more the Jeffries, even in the second rd
  7. man. its no fun watching the bulls with that jab in Roses back.
  8. did they take a fun jab?
  9. it was fun. he took a pretty awesome jab.
  10. comon Leo, just take a jab at this guy, it will be fun.
  11. I hope we take a few fun jabs at the DE position.
  12. Why can't they? Cap space?
  13. I mean I'm not sure how different he is from Bennett.
  14. the kind that dont grow on rollin stones
  15. when do we get the wallabies?
  16. I think Soldier Field is a federally-designated landmark, whereas Wrigley is a Chicago landmark. right, Wrigley is eligible for the national trust where as SF was on it, but it has been removed.
  17. The committee "controls" very little. A good design team can work around all of that. As for SF, I said extreme example for a reason.
  18. Umm, have you tried to build ANYTHING in the last 15 years? There are always committees. Besides, Wrigley is only restricted on a few of its historical pieces, such as the ivy, scoreboard and I believe the exterior marque. There is plenty that can be done to it without upsetting "the committee". If you want an extreme example, look at what was done with Soldier Field which had a very simular designation
  19. I don't think you know what you're talking about
  20. ohhh, just you wait. I don't remember which designation Wrigley has with the NTHP, but it would certainly be something they need to consider in the design process. And forget tearing it down, that will likely never happen with its designation.
  21. it's not that it needs to be heated, curing concrete creates heat on its own. The issue is that while concrete cures, it needs to be kept wet. The water used to keep it wet needs to be kept from freezing. That's why you temper a space that is receiving a pour. Admixtures help too. but yea, they pour in pretty cold temps in MPLS, they can do it in Chicago too. I have worked a lot of construction in my life and from personal experience you can pour concrete in some really crappy weather conditions, including very cold. It probably needs to be covered to trap in the heat while curing also. well, yea, that's what I'm saying.
  22. Seems skinny on the trade to NY
  23. it's not that it needs to be heated, curing concrete creates heat on its own. The issue is that while concrete cures, it needs to be kept wet. The water used to keep it wet needs to be kept from freezing. That's why you temper a space that is receiving a pour. Admixtures help too. but yea, they pour in pretty cold temps in MPLS, they can do it in Chicago too.
×
×
  • Create New...